Short-term let accommodation at 2F1 100 West Bow, Edinburgh
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee on 5 Aug 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought retrospective permission to change a two-bedroom flat from residential use to short-term let accommodation, without physical changes.
“The application site is located at the base of West Bow and at the top of the Grassmarket. This area has a busy commercial character on the street, with residential dwellings located above shopfronts. The area is mixed commercial/residential, however, does experience a significant footfall as a tourist destination.”
“The application is for the retrospective change of use of the property from a flatted dwelling to short term let (STL). No internal or external physical changes are proposed. The applicant indicates on the application form that the operation of the property as a short term let commenced on 19/06/2017.”
Officer report
The site
The flat is on the second floor of a six-storey tenement in a mixed commercial and residential area at the top of the Grassmarket.
“The application property is a second-floor flatted dwelling within a six storey tenement with commercial use at the ground floor. The property comprises two bedrooms, bathroom and combined kitchen/living room. The approximate floor area of the property is 52.7 square metres.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
Earlier lawfulness and planning applications for the property were refused, while a review was withdrawn and an appeal was dismissed.
“Request For Review – Application No: 25/00723/FULSTL Status: Review Withdrawn.”
“Appeal to DPEA against application 23/04624/CLESTL, decided 20 May 2024. DPEA Reference: CLUD-230-2065 Status: Appeal Dismissed. Decision Date: 05 November 2024”
Officer report
Main planning concerns
Short-term visitors and extra servicing could increase disturbance in the shared entrance and stairwell, while the claimed economic benefits did not outweigh losing a home.
“The use of this property as an STL would introduce an increased frequency of movement to the property through the shared entrance and corridor, enabling visitors to arrive and stay at the premises for a short period of time on a regular basis throughout the year in a manner dissimilar to that of permanent residents.”
“To comply with the policy, it is not sufficient to demonstrate that the STL use will deliver economic benefits; rather, it must be demonstrated that the economic benefits associated with any individual application are significant enough that they warrant the loss of a home, and the economic and other benefits associated with this.”
Officer report
The committee’s decision
The committee refused planning permission for the reasons set out in the officer report.
“26/02137/FULSTL - Report by the Chief Planning Officer To REFUSE planning permission for the reasons set out in section C of the report by the Chief Planning Officer.”
Minutes
Sources
- Edinburgh Development Management Sub-Committee minutes, 5 August 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Edinburgh's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Edinburgh
- Date
- Wednesday 5 August 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended refusal
- Committee decided
- Refused
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Edinburgh committee decisions →
This committee's year
289 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.