Two access roads at Street Record, Dorothy Avenue, Hucknall
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Ashfield Planning Committee on 2 Sept 2026.
What was proposed
The application seeks two access roads from Dorothy Avenue and Delia Avenue to serve 131 dwellings.
“The Application This is an application for the construction of two access roads off Dorothy Avenue and Delia Avenue to provide access to 131 dwellings on the land to the east of Hayden Lane, Hucknall.”
Officer report
Highway and biodiversity issues
Highways modelling covered six junctions, while biodiversity net gain was proposed through off-site credits and a future gain plan.
“The applicant has provided a statement which does not provide any further technical information but does provide an overview of the Transport Assessment submitted with the application, this includes confirmation that the following 6 junctions were modelled at peak times: • Junction 1: Hayden Lane/Dorothy Avenue • Junction 2: Hayden Lane/ Bernard Avenue • Junction 3: Church Lane/Bernard Avenue • Junction 4: Hayden Lane/Delia Avenue • Junction 5: Ethel Avenue/ Hayden Lane…”
“The applicant has confirmed that the 10% biodiversity net gain (BNG) will be secured via purchasing off-site credits from a local habitat bank because it is recognised that it cannot be achieved on this site, This mitigation accords with central government policy on BNG. ADC’s Ecologist has reviewed the additional information and as the site location plan has been slightly altered a new BNG calculation is required.”
Officer report
What people said
Fourteen objections raised concerns about traffic, parking, noise, ecology, infrastructure, enforcement and local services.
“Ecology • Off-site credits do not help local area. • Loss of habitats and ecosystems…”
“Other • Impact on infrastructure (sewerage system) • who will be accountable for strict enforcement, and what the consequences of non-compliance will be • no economic uplift for Hucknall • impact on local amenities (schools etc)”
Officer report
Who addressed the committee
An objector, a representative for the applicant and Councillor John Wilmott addressed the committee.
What members considered
The committee received a late legal opinion arguing that the access works had limited scope and that technical concerns could be managed.
“A Legal Opinion on behalf of the developer had been received which included the following six points:”
“The Marion Avenue appeal and costs decisions confirm the limited scope of an access-only application, the relevance of technical highway advice, the ability to control temporary construction impacts by condition, and the costs risk of refusing permission on unsubstantiated grounds.”
Minutes
Recorded committee motion
A motion for conditional consent, in line with the officer recommendation, was moved and seconded.
“It was moved and seconded that conditional consent be granted, as per the officer’s recommendation contained in the report.”
Minutes
Sources
- Ashfield Planning Committee minutes, 2 September 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Ashfield's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Ashfield Planning Committee
- Council
- Ashfield
- Date
- Wednesday 2 September 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Ashfield committee decisions →
This committee's year
29 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 5 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.