Single-storey rear extension at 24 Bolingey Way, Hucknall

“The Application This is a Householder application for a Single Storey Rear Extension.”

“The extension will adjoin a previously approved single-storey side and rear extension to the east elevation of the existing dwelling. This extension will be used to expand onto the existing kitchen/family room and to create an additional utility room.”

“The application site consists of a two-storey detached dwelling located on the corner of Bolingey Way and Tudor Court, in the main urban area of Hucknall where development is acceptable under policy ST2 of the Ashfield Local Plan Review (2002).”

“Relevant Planning History Application Reference: V/1993/0544 Proposal: Single Storey Extension and Detached Garage Decision: Conditional Consent Decision Date: 30/09/1993”

“Application Reference: V/1984/0748 Proposal: Erection of Garage Decision: Conditional Decision Date: 20/12/1984”

“The proposed development is considered to be appropriate. The impact on visual and residential amenity has been assessed, and it is considered that there will be no undue harm to neighbouring properties and the proposal will have a minimal impact on the visual amenity of the street scene and surrounding area. It is therefore recommended that this application is granted planning permission subject to the following conditions.”

“Recommendation: Full application conditional consent…”

“Consultations Individual notifications have been posted to surrounding residents. The following comments have been received:”

“NCC Highways Confirm that they have no observations to make on the application.”

“The proposed development has been assessed for impact on residential amenity in terms of overshadowing, overlooking and overbearing. After this assessment, it is considered that the extension will not lead to significant harm on adjacent neighbouring properties.”

“The rear extension does not breach the 45-degree rule in elevation or in plan. As such, due to the siting of the proposal, it is considered unlikely that the proposal would cause a detrimental impact on the residential amenity of neighbouring properties in terms of overshadowing and overbearing impacts.”

“It was moved and seconded that conditional consent be granted, as per the officer’s recommendation contained in the report.”

“The materials and finishes to be used for external roof of the proposal shall be in accordance with those submitted in the Proposed Elevations and Floor Plans (DWG No: 26-3156-2) Received 30/04/2026”

“This permission shall be read in accordance with the following plans: • Site Location Plan, Received 30/04/2026 • Proposed Elevations and Floor Plans (DWG NO. 26-3156-2) Received 30/04/2026 This development shall therefore be undertaken in accordance with these plans unless otherwise agree in writing by the Local Planning Authority…”