Bechwood, Boxhill Road, Boxhill, Tadworth, Surrey, KT20 7JN Data via plota.co.uk

MO/2026/01326 - Variance of Conditions Live

Proposal

Variation of Condition 2 of planning permissions for the Variation to Condition 2 of approved planning application for the demolition of existing dwelling and the erection of 4 dwellings, to allow changes to the roof forms and elevations to Plots 2 & 4, and for the Discharge of Condition 4 of approved planning application for the demolition of existing and erection of 4 dwellings, to allow a reduction in garden area including alterations to landscaping and boundary treatments. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
13 Jul 2026
✓
Validated
10 Sept 2026
Decision
Expected by 5 Nov 2026

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 5 Nov 2026. Comments are open until 13 Oct 2026.

Comment on this application ↗

Associated applications 5

  • Part of

    Fullcouncil archive

    Conditions details submitted for · variation sought for

    • Variationarchive

      Conditions details submitted for 2, 10 · variation sought for 4

    • Show 1 more · 1 approved
      • Conditionsarchive

Site constraints 8

Tree preservation order
Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm.
Surrey Hills National Landscape
Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
Priority habitat: No main habitat but additional habitats present
A habitat of principal importance. It shapes the ecology work and the biodiversity net gain a scheme has to show.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Special area of conservation 280 m away: Mole Gap to Reigate Escarpment
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Tree preservation orderCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Also on the record
SSSI 280 m away: Mole Gap to Reigate Escarpment SSSI; Inside the Box Hill built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 21 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Sales history 1

Last sold for £1,150,000 in September 2024. Other property, freehold.

17 September 2024£1,150,000Recorded as a transfer outside a standard sale

Sale prices from HM Land Registry's price paid record, matched to this application by its address.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Mole Valley - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Variance of Conditions
Postcode
KT20 7JN
Received
13 Jul 2026
Validated
10 Sept 2026
Ward
Brockham, Betchworth, Buckland, Box Hill & Headley
Parish
Non Parish Area
Case officer
Show
Target decision
5 Nov 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Freehold owner
Show

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP/2026/01033
Comments by
13 Oct 2026
Committee
18 Aug 2026
Statutory expiry
5 Nov 2026
Env. assessment
No
Mole Valley
Planning Authority Score
2.1/10
Poor
#270 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Mole Valley is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #240 out of 296. Mole Valley is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 76% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 76% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Mole Valley decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
72%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #291 of 296
76%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #291 of 296
50%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #240 of 296
43%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #172 of 296
47%
Minor dwellings approved
114 decided (1-9 homes)
71%
Major dwellings approved
7 decided (10+ homes)
93%
Change of use approved
15 decided
913
Total decisions
259 refused in the year to March 2026

Sale prices: Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right 2026. This data is licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Freehold boundary: © Crown copyright and database rights 2026, HM Land Registry. Polygons © Crown copyright and database rights 2026 Ordnance Survey 100026316. Conditions of use

Freehold owner: Information produced by HM Land Registry. © Crown copyright 2026. Source: HM Land Registry, UK and overseas companies that own property in England and Wales, September 2026 release.