One detached dwelling at 10 Saxby Hill, Saxby All Saints

The site

The site is a side garden within the development limits and conservation area, beside a steep lane and open fields.

“RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY 7/1982/0349: Outline planning permission for a single dwelling – refused PA/1997/0217: Extension to a single garage to make double – approved PA/2020/546: Outline planning permission to erect up to 90 dwellings and two retail units, with public open space incorporating new green infrastructure, SuDS features, a local equipped area for play (LEAP), woodland planting and biodiversity enhancements, with appearance, landscaping, layout and scale…”

“There are no listed buildings nearby. • There is a tree preservation order to the west of the site which is unaffected by the proposed development. • The site is within flood zone 1 which is at low risk of flooding. ASSESSMENT Site and proposal The application site comprises the side garden of the property known as Carrdale, 10 Saxby Hill. Saxby Hill itself is a steep lane rising up from the main village street.”

Officer report

Officers’ assessment

Officers considered the design, scale, landscaping, amenity, drainage, ecology and highway arrangements acceptable subject to conditions.

“The main issues in determining this application are: • Appearance, scale and layout, including impact on the local character of the area • landscaping • residential amenity • drainage • ecology • highway safety. The acceptability of this reserved matters application is dependent on it being in general accordance with the outline planning permission and subject to other relevant material considerations being satisfied.”

“Highway safety The LHA has been consulted on the current application, the outline application, and the application for the new access, so is fully aware of the complementary proposals. The officer raises no objection subject to conditions requiring the provision and maintenance of visibility splays and parking/turning areas, and the prohibition of loose material being laid on the proposed driveway within 10 metres of the highway.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The conservation, ecology, flood, highway and archaeology consultees raised no objection or had no further comments, subject to conditions where applicable.

“LC6 Habitat creation LC7 landscape protection T2 Access to development T6 Pedestrian routes and footpaths T19 Car parking provision DS1 General requirements DS14 Foul sewage and surface water drainage DS16 Flood risk HE2 Development in Conservation Areas North Lincolnshire Core Strategy: CS1 Spatial strategy for North Lincolnshire CS2 Delivering more sustainable development CS3 Development limits CS5 Delivering quality design in North…”

“…average potential and noted it was fish stocked, reducing great crested newt potential. An eDNA test was undertaken, and negative results were recorded. No further comments to make.”

Officer report

Who spoke

A representative of the applicant addressed the committee before members considered the application.

The committee vote

Councillor C Ross moved approval, Councillor C Patterson seconded it, and the motion was carried.

“It was then moved by Councillor C Ross and seconded by Councillor C Patterson –”

“Resolved - That planning permission be granted in accordance with the recommendations contained within the Planning Officer’s report.”

Minutes