Four-bedroom HMO at 98 Grove Road, Strood, Rochester

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Medway Planning Committee on 3 Jun 2026.

MC/26/0606Approved

What was proposed

The application proposed a four-bedroom, five-person HMO, roof accommodation including a rear dormer and front roof lights, and rear extensions.

“The application seeks permission for a change of use of the property from a single dwellinghouse (Class C3) to a house of multiple occupation (HMO) (Class C4) along with a single storey rear extension and a L-shaped dormer to facilitate living accommodation in the roof space. The property would comprise:”

“Ground Floor: 1X bedroom with ensuite shower room, kitchen/dining room and lounge. First Floor: 1X bedroom with ensuite shower room, 1X bedroom, 1X bathroom. Second Floor/Loft: 1X bedroom with ensuite shower room.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The property is an end-of-terrace dwelling near Strood railway station, in a mixed-use area with nearby shops, flats, a car park and transport links.

“Most suitable locations, according to paragraph 5.5.28 of the Local Plan, are likely to be within or on the fringes of town centres or on main roads where there is a mix of land use and unlikely to be suited to family occupation. In this case, the property is located in a mixed-use street with a car park, convenience store and flats within close proximity.”

“The application site is located on Grove Road, close to Strood railway station in the urban area of Strood. Grove Road is a single lane road with Grove Road Car Park located on the north side and the application property to the south. The property is an end of terrace, two-storey dwelling which sits hard up to the pavement.”

Officer report

Earlier planning history

An earlier application for a six-bedroom HMO with similar extensions was withdrawn, while an earlier shop conversion application was refused.

“MC/25/2499 Change of use from dwelling house (Class C3) to 6 bed houses in multiple occupation (Class C4). Construction of single storey extension to rear along with an L-shaped dormer to rear and roof lights to front to facilitate living accommodation in the roof space.”

“Withdrawn 25 February 2026 81/513 Change of use of part of ground floor from residential to shop Refused 4 August 1981”

Officer report

Why officers recommended approval

Officers considered the conversion, design, living conditions and transport arrangements acceptable, subject to conditions controlling occupation, parking, cycles and refuse.

“While it is understood that the application site would not be able to meet its parking need off-street, nor does the current use as a single occupancy dwellinghouse. Likewise, the Medway Residential Parking Standards state: "Reductions of the standard will be considered if the development is within an urban area that has good links to sustainable transport and where day-to-day facilities are within easy walking distance”.”

“Cycle storage for five cycles is proposed in the rear garden. This is considered acceptable subject to a condition ensuring that this is provided prior to the occupation of the HMO.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The City of Rochester Society objected, Kent Police offered crime-prevention advice, and Southern Water raised no objection.

“The City of Rochester Society have objected to the proposal due to concerns over an increase in noise and anti-social behaviour and lack of parking provision as part of the proposal in an area of limited on and off-street parking. Additionally, concerns have been raised over a precedent being set of further conversions in the area.”

“Kent Police have welcomed further discussions with the applicant/agent about site specific designing out crime approaches and have provided additional advice with respect to lighting and natural surveillance, security and boundary treatments and other approaches that could be implemented within the development.”

Officer report

Objections received

One representation objected on grounds of noise, disturbance, privacy, changes to area character and construction impacts.

“Noise and disturbance Impact on privacy Change the character of the area. Construction noise and disturbance…”

Officer report

Committee discussion

Members discussed local HMO levels, amended conditions, bedroom sizes, parking management and preventing refuse accumulation along the alleyway.

“The Committee considered the application in detail and Members requested that an additional condition be imposed requiring the installation of an alley gate, in order to prevent the accumulation of refuse along the alleyway. The Service Manager – Development Management advised that he was not sure…”

“The Service Manager – Development Management confirmed that Medway Council’s Highways Team had advised that a parking survey was not necessary. The Chief Planning Officer clarified that as the application site fell within a parking restriction zone, a Parking Management Plan was recommended. This would set out measures to deter residents from obtaining parking permits.”

Minutes

The committee’s decision

The application was approved with conditions, amended plans and conditions, plus an additional alley-gate condition or informative.

“Approved with conditions 1 to 8 as set out in the report for the reasons stated in the report with amended conditions 2, 5 and 6. An additional condition or informative to be added to secure alley gates on both ends of the alley.”

“Revised plans for cycle parking were submitted and the conditions 2, 5 and 6 were amended:”

Minutes

Sources

  • Medway Planning Committee minutes, 3 June 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Medway's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Medway
Date
Wednesday 3 June 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

57 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 5 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →