Five-bedroom HMO at 32 Salisbury Road, Chatham

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Medway Planning Committee on 1 Jul 2026.

MC/26/0769RefusedAgainst officer advice

What was proposed

The application sought to change a three-bedroom dwelling into a five-bedroom HMO with internal alterations and a single-storey rear extension.

“This application seeks planning permission for the conversion of the existing 3 bed, Use Class C3, property into a C4 five-bedroom HMO.”

“The proposal also includes a single storey rear extension to provide the living room part of the dining/living room.”

Officer report

Ward concerns

The ward councillor said the area had many HMOs, constrained parking and traffic concerns near two schools, and requested refusal or deferral.

“With the agreement of the Committee, Councillor Maple addressed the Committee as Ward Councillor and raised the following concerns:”

“For clarification, the application would have been referred to the Planning Committee due to the number of representations, irrespective of the Article 4 Direction. • There were already high numbers of HMOs within the locality. • Local residents and representatives of the New Road Parents Community had raised concerns regarding additional traffic and parking pressures.”

Minutes

Members’ concerns

Members discussed highway safety, parking pressure, possible increased traffic and the loss of a family dwelling.

“Members discussed the planning application in detail and expressed concerns regarding highway safety, existing parking pressures, the potential increase in traffic movement and the loss of a family dwelling.”

“The Senior Planner confirmed that Condition 7, required a Parking Management Plan to be submitted, prior to first occupation of the development. The plan would set out how parking would be managed for residents and visitors and would include measures to minimise parking impacts on the surrounding area.”

Minutes

The recommendation was lost

Members voted on the officers’ recommendation to approve, which was lost, then considered deferral or refusal.

“The Committee then voted on the officers’ recommendation to approve the planning application, which was lost. Members subsequently considered whether it would be appropriate to defer the determination of the planning application pending the proposed highways investigations, or whether the application should be refused.”

Minutes

The application was refused

The committee refused the application because of parking demand and pressure, highway hazards, and the loss of a family dwelling.

“The proposed use as a 6 person House in Multiple Occupation would generate a greater level of parking demand than the existing three bedroom dwelling and in the absence of any parking provision would result in increased parking pressure and indiscriminate parking in an area of parking stress in close proximity to parking restrictions and a primary school, which would interfere with pedestrian use of the footpaths and cause highway hazards contrary to policies H7, T1 and…”

“The proposed change of use from a C3 dwelling to a C4 House in Multiple Occupation would result in the loss of a family dwelling that would reasonably be expected to be occupied by a single household contrary to Policy H7 of the Medway Local Plan (2003) and T8 of the Regulation 22 Medway Local Plan 2041 (December 2025).”

Minutes

The members' reasons

The resolution gives these reasons:

“On the following grounds: 1 The proposed use as a 6 person House in Multiple Occupation would generate a greater level of parking demand than the existing three bedroom dwelling and in the absence of any parking provision would result in increased parking pressure and indiscriminate parking in an area of parking stress in close proximity to parking restrictions and a primary school, which would interfere with pedestrian use of the footpaths and cause highway hazards contrary to policies H7, T1 and T13 of the Medway Local Plan (2003), T8 of the Regulation 22 Medway Local Plan 2041 (December…”

Minutes

Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.

Sources

  • Medway Planning Committee minutes, 1 July 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Medway's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Medway
Date
Wednesday 1 July 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Refused, against officer advice
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

65 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 6 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →