Restaurant frontage alterations at Averna, The Green, Claygate, Esher

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Elmbridge East Area Planning Sub-Committee on 29 Jun 2026.

2026/0682Approved

What was proposed

The application proposed changes to the restaurant’s front windows and moving its front entrance.

“Planning permission is sought for alterations to the front fenestration and the repositioning of the front entrance to the restaurant.”

Officer report

The site

The restaurant is in a terraced row forming part of the established frontage around The Green and lies in a conservation area.

“The application site comprises The Averna Restaurant, located on The Green, St Leonard’s Road, Claygate. The property lies within the Claygate Village Conservation Area and forms part of the established built frontage around The Green.”

“The building is a terraced property within a row of similar traditional buildings. It is currently in restaurant use, with an active frontage.”

Officer report

Earlier planning history

A 2016 new-frontage proposal was refused, while a 2019 retrospective application concerned a rear outbuilding and extension finishes.

“Reference Description Decision 2019/0924 Retrospective application for single-storey rear outbuilding and alterations to finish of rear extension.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended permission because the changes were modest, matched the existing shopfront and would preserve the conservation area.

“The Council’s Conservation Officer has reviewed the proposal and noted that the existing shopfront has a pleasing symmetrical appearance which would be lost. However, they also concluded that, subject to matching finishes, the repositioning of the entrance door would not have a significant impact on the visual character of the shopfront and that the character and appearance of the Conservation Area would be preserved. This assessment is given weight.”

“Overall, while the proposal would result in some loss of symmetry to the restaurant frontage, the extent of change would be modest and confined to the shopfront. Subject to a condition requiring the external finish to match the existing, the proposal would preserve the character and appearance of the Claygate Village Conservation Area and would not result in unacceptable harm to the host building, street scene or wider area. The proposal would therefore…”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The parish council objected that moving the door would disrupt symmetry and create an unbalanced frontage in an important conservation area location.

“The proposed relocation of the door would disrupt the symmetry resulting in an unbalanced frontage at a key location of the Conservation Area.”

Officer report

Neighbour concerns

One objection letter raised concerns about conservation-area harm, lost symmetry, an incongruous alteration and conflict with design guidance.

“Harm to the character and appearance of the Claygate Conservation Area. • Loss of the existing symmetrical frontage through the relocation of one entrance door. • Visually incongruous alteration that fails to respect the architectural composition of the host building. • Conflict with the Elmbridge Design Code 2024 in relation to coherent elevations and visual harmony within the street scene.”

Officer report

The committee decision

The committee permitted the application with the conditions set out in the agenda.

“One further letter of objection received.”

“Permit with the conditions as outlined in the agenda.”

Minutes

Conditions attached

The permission required commencement within three years, compliance with approved plans and matching external materials.

“Time limit (full application) The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.”

“Reason: To comply with Section 51 of Part 4 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004. List of approved plans The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in strict accordance with the following list of approved plans: Drawing No. 1 - 247, 2 - 247, 3 - 247 received on 20/03/2026.”

Officer report

Sources

  • Elmbridge East Area Planning Sub-Committee minutes, 29 June 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Elmbridge's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Elmbridge
Date
Monday 29 June 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

8 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →