Community hall extension at Carstairs Junction Hall, Carstairs Junction

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by South Lanarkshire Planning Committee on 8 Sept 2026.

P/26/0396Approved

What was proposed

A 166-square-metre rear extension would provide two enlarged meeting rooms and a kitchen, alongside internal changes and four air source heat pumps.

“Description of Proposed Development 3.1. Planning permission is sought for the erection of a 30m x 5.4m single storey extension to the rear of the hall. This would enlarge the existing 277sqm footprint by an additional 166sqm. The eaves height of the extension would reach 2.6m (h), with its lean-to-roof rising to a maximum height of 3.8m (h) where it connects into the existing dual pitch roof.”

“a soft play area • a seating area • the existing meeting rooms would be converted into sensory rooms • the toilets area would be retained • the existing kitchen would be adapted into a food preparation area…”

Officer report

The site

The hall is a single-storey timber-clad building in a parkland setting, with parking, pedestrian access and surrounding greenspace.

“Carstairs Junction Hall is a single-storey gable ended building, that sits within a parkland setting. Its external walls are clad in timber with a facing brick basecourse below, and it has photovoltaic panels located upon its profile concrete tile roof. Off- street vehicle parking on a hard surfaced area to the front of the building, and pedestrian access to the hall can be accessed from St Charles Avenue.”

“The applicant has a lease over the building, associated car park, and some land surrounding the Carstairs Junction Hall for a period of 20 years with the remainder of the application site owned by the Council.”

Officer report

Planning history

The site had no relevant planning history, and the hall lease was acquired through a community asset transfer in 2025.

“Site Description 2.1. The application site extends to approximately 0.567ha. The site sits within the Carstairs Junction settlement, and a lease for the community hall building was acquired under the CAT/25/0004 community asset transfer application that was passed by the Housing and Technical Resources Committee on 8 October 2025.”

Officer report

Why approval was advised

The proposal would support the hall’s community use without adversely affecting the building, neighbouring homes, traffic safety or the surrounding area.

“Layout, Siting and Design 10.7. Policy 14 of NPF4, Design Quality and Place seeks to encourage successful places, through incorporating these 6 qualities: healthy, pleasant, connected, distinctive, sustainable, and adaptable. The proposal would reuse the existing community building on the site, creating a single-storey rear extension that would add two meeting rooms, and a kitchen to the rear of the building.”

“In relation to the other matters raised, some of the representations identified concerns regarding potential noise impact. The proposal is located a sufficient distance from the nearest shared boundary (21m) from the proposed rear extension. Prior to the application, the closest point between the Hall and the closest neighbouring dwelling would have been a 26m distance. The proposal would enlarge the capacity of the hall but would not change the nature of its use.”

Officer report

Consultation and public views

Archaeology and roads consultees raised no objections; six objections and six supporting representations were received.

“Representations 7.1. Following the statutory periods of neighbour notification and advertisement, 6 objections have been received, and 6 in support. The issues raised are summarised as follows:-”

Officer report

Issues raised

Objectors cited loss of greenspace, noise, neighbour impact, traffic, bird nesting and lack of need, while supporters cited community benefits and more events.

“Design and Amenity Issues • Loss of greenspace • Noise impact • Impact on the amenity of neighbouring dwellings • Use of surrounding land for the extension • Excessive size of proposed kitchen…”

“Other Matters Raised • No need for the Hall to be extended • Concern about bird nesting…”

Officer report

Committee discussion

During discussion, an officer undertook to find out whether the development would meet the criteria for developer funding.

“There followed a discussion on the application during which an officer undertook to find out if the development would meet the criteria for developer funding.”

Minutes

The committee’s decision

The committee granted planning permission for the extension and alterations, subject to the specified condition.

“The Committee decided: that planning application P/26/0396 by Soul of the Junction for the erection of a single storey rear extension and associated alterations at Carstairs Junction Hall, 20 St Charles Avenue, Carstairs Junction be granted subject to the conditions specified in the Executive Director’s report.”

Minutes

Permission condition

The development must begin within three years of the decision notice being granted.

“Grant full planning permission subject to conditions:-”

“The development to which this permission relates shall be begun no later than the expiration of three years beginning with the date of grant of this decision notice.”

Officer report

Sources

  • South Lanarkshire Planning Committee minutes, 8 September 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of South Lanarkshire's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Tuesday 8 September 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

62 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →