Swift's Riding Whelp Street Preston St Mary Sudbury Suffolk CO10 9NJ Data via plota.co.uk

DC/26/01863 - Discharge of Condition(s) Decided

Proposal

Discharge of Conditions application for - Conditions 7 (Electric Vehicle Charging), 8 (Cycle Storage), 9 (Demolition and construction Management Plan), 10 (Refuse Storage Details), 11 (Investigation and Remediation method statement), 14 (Biodiversity Enhancement Strategy), 16 (Materials), 19 (Foul Water Drainage), 20 (Manure Runoff Management), 21 (Solid Waste Management Plan), 25 (Construction Management Plan), 26 (Landscaping Scheme) and the Biodiversity Gain Condition… Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

Received
1 May 2026
Consultation
26 Jun 2026
Part Granted/Part Refused
14 Jul 2026

Part Granted/Part Refused on 14 Jul 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 15 Jul 2026

Documents 26

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 16, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26 decided (outcome not recorded)

    • ConditionsDischarge of Conditions - Conditions 7 (Electric Vehicle Charging), 8 (Cycle Storage), 9…This applicationDC/26/01863

Site constraints 1

Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Predicted from the national soil map. The older provisional map, which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Babergh Mid Suffolk - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Discharge of Condition(s)
Postcode
CO10 9NJ
Received
1 May 2026
Validated
1 May 2026
Ward
North West Cosford
Parish
Preston St Mary
Case officer
Show
Target decision
26 Jun 2026
Decision
Part Granted/Part Refused
Decision date
14 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Peter Wells Architects Limited

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14898516
Consultation
26 Jun 2026
Comments by
10 Jul 2026
Env. assessment
No
Babergh Mid Suffolk
Planning Authority Score
7.7/10
Good
#33 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Babergh Mid Suffolk is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #56 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Babergh Mid Suffolk decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #124 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #68 of 296
77%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #56 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #83 of 296
74%
Minor dwellings approved
160 decided (1-9 homes)
73%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
93%
Change of use approved
40 decided
882
Total decisions
99 refused in the year to March 2026