Listed building alterations at Beech Tree Farm East Green Kelsale Cum, Carlton, Saxmundham
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by East Suffolk Planning Committee North on 11 Aug 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought replacement windows and doors, a rooflight and internal layout changes at the listed farmhouse.
“The proposed development seeks permission to replace windows and doors within both the historic and modern parts of the property, as well as the installation of a rooflight and internal alterations to the layout at Beech Tree Farm, East Green, Kelsale Cum Carlton.”
“The proposal involves the following external alterations: - Replacement of fixed timber screen in 1990s extension. The existing screen is to be replaced by timber folding doors. - The replacement of the 1930s metal window located at ground floor level on the south-eastern elevation with new french doors and side lights. The doors and side lights are proposed to be aluminium painted black.”
Officer report
The site and building
Beech Tree Farmhouse is a detached Grade II listed 17th-century dwelling on a large plot predominantly bounded by agricultural land.
“Beech Tree Farmhouse is a Grade II listed building that dates from the 17th century. It is a detached residential dwellinghouse which lies on a large plot of land set back from the highway and can be accessed by a track which runs to the south-east of the main property. This track passes the property itself and leads to a collection of agricultural buildings on a separate plot, outside of the curtilage of the house itself.”
“The property is predominantly bounded by agricultural land.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the works would preserve the listed building’s special interest and would not harm its significance.
“Therefore, it is judged that these applications will preserve the special interest of the Grade II listed Beech Tree Farm, in conformance with the requirements of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990.”
“This proposal would preserve the special interest of the Grade II listed Beech Tree Farm. There would be no harm to this designated heritage asset in conformance with the requirements of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990. The relevant tests of the NPPF at paragraphs 213-215 are not engaged.”
Officer report
Heritage effects
The external and internal changes were considered acceptable because most work affected the 1990s extension, while the historic alterations were appropriately designed.
“The rooflight is proposed to be inserted within the 1990s extension. While the rooflight would be visible adjacent to the roof of the historic part of the house, it would be located in a non-historic part of the building, and therefore no historic fabric would be affected.”
“The changes to the internal layout are also contained within the 1990s extension. These are a minor alteration to the layout of the non-historic part of the house, and therefore no historic fabric would be affected. As such, there would be no harm to the significance of the heritage asset.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
The parish council had no objection, the Design and Heritage Team considered the building’s significance preserved, and no third-party representations were received.
“No third party representations have been received.”
Officer report
Committee decision
Councillor Ashdown proposed approval and Councillor Wakeling seconded it; the committee resolved to approve the application.
“On the proposition of Councillor Ashdown, seconded by Councillor Wakeling it was…”
Minutes
Conditions attached
Approval required commencement within three years, compliance with the approved documents and prior approval of details for one replacement door.
“The development hereby permitted shall be begun not later than the expiration of three years from the date of this permission.”
“Prior to the replacement of the ground floor single door on the south-eastern elevation of the modern extension, details of the appearance, materials, opening operation, glazing type and ironmongery of the proposed door shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.”
Minutes
Sources
- East Suffolk Planning Committee North minutes, 11 August 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of East Suffolk's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- East Suffolk
- Date
- Tuesday 11 August 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- East Suffolk committee decisions →
This committee's year
37 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 2 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.