House extensions at 3 Southdean Gardens, Wimbledon, London SW19
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Wandsworth Planning Applications Committee on 17 Sept 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed rear and side extensions, a rear mansard roof extension with dormers, and a pitched roof over the front bay and porch.
“This householder application proposes alterations including the erection of a single storey rear extension, and two storey side extension to the rear half of the building, including the infilling of the stepped flank wall and new windows; the erection of a rear mansard roof extension to the main roof with dormer windows and French doors and safety railings; and the replacement of the existing flat roof over the front ground floor bay and porch with a pitched roof.”
“The proposed single storey rear extension would measure 4.2m in width, 4.0m in depth on the eastern side and 7.8m in depth on the western side. The proposed extension would have a part flat, part pitched roof measuring 3.2m in height on the eastern elevation and an eaves height of 2.6m on the western elevation measured from the garden level of the subject property. The proposed extension would have an additional 0.2m high parapet on the rear and eastern elevation.”
Officer report
The site
The property is a two-storey mid-terrace house with roof accommodation, a small front garden and narrow rear garden beside a tennis club.
“The subject property is a two-storey (with roof accommodation), mid-terrace property located on the northern side of Southdean Gardens and has a small front garden and narrow rear garden. Similar two-storey terraced properties adjoin to the east and are located opposite the site to the south. A smaller two-storey property adjoins to the west and the Gardens Lawn Tennis Club is located to the north/rear of the site.”
Officer report
Earlier planning history
An earlier application in 1971 was granted conditionally for conversion of the dwelling into two self-contained units.
“January 1971 (70/7339) Granted - Conditional: Conversion of dwelling into two self- contained units.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval with conditions, finding the development appropriately designed and unlikely to cause unacceptable harm to the property, neighbours or surrounding area.
“Official Official 5.1 In considering the above, overall, the proposed development would be of a design and scale that is considered appropriate in this context and location. The proposed additions would not result in an undue detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the subject property, neighbouring properties or the surrounding area and would be acceptable.”
“While the proposed single-storey ground-floor rear extension would result in some additional overshadowing and increased sense of enclosure for No.5 Southdean Gardens, it is not considered that this would be to an unacceptable degree and a reasonable level of outlook would be retained.”
Officer report
What people said
Five initial neighbour objections and three objections after reconsultation raised concerns about overdevelopment, visual bulk, outlook, daylight, privacy, access and construction effects.
“Neighbour Consultation Summary OBJECTIONS: summarised as: • Overdevelopment • Excessive form, scale and massing • Out of context • Does not preserve character or form of original property • Impact on architectural hierarchy of the original building • Infilling the stepped flank wall in order to create a continuous elevation would materially reduce the visual separation between the properties and create the impression of a continuous built form • Visible from the street •…”
“Neighbour Reconsultation Summary OBJECTIONS: summarised as: • Previous objections still stand • Overdevelopment • Excessive form, scale and massing • Excessive and unsympathetic glazing • Out of context • Does not preserve character or form of original property • Impact on architectural hierarchy of the original building • Infilling the stepped flank wall in order to create a continuous elevation would materially reduce the visual separation between the properties and create…”
Officer report
The committee vote
The committee unanimously agreed that planning permission should be granted as set out in the report.
“2026/1569) 3 Southdean Gardens, SW19 6NT – (unanimous) that planning permission be granted as set out in the report.”
Minutes
Sources
- Wandsworth Planning Applications Committee minutes, 17 September 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Wandsworth's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Wandsworth
- Date
- Thursday 17 September 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Wandsworth committee decisions →
This committee's year
60 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.