Site Of Former Mayfield Chicks Blackburn Road Edenfield Bury Lancashire BB4 6JY Data via plota.co.uk

2026/0135 - Non-Material Amendment Approved

Proposal

Application for a Non-Material Amendment pursuant to planning permission , to enable an increase in finished ground levels, reconfiguration of kerb lines within the approved service yard and associated amendments to the drainage arrangement. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
14 Apr 2026
✓
Consultation
24 Apr 2026
✓
Approved
29 Jun 2026

Approved on 29 Jun 2026 · Last checked 5 Jul 2026

Documents 34

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 3

Site constraints 8

Article 4 direction
Immediate Article 4 Direction for small Houses in Multiple Occupation. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
2 listed buildings within 150 m
Nearest: Ashenbottom Farmhouse, Grade II, 25 m away · 1 Grade II*, 1 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 2 with distances
Historic England ↗
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Coalfield, development low risk area; Inside the Ewood Bridge built-up area; Green belt 22 m away: Merseyside and Greater Manchester; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 4, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rossendale - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rossendale
Application type
Non-Material Amendment
Postcode
BB4 6JY
Received
14 Apr 2026
Validated
14 Apr 2026
Ward
Greenfield And Eden
Case officer
Show
Target decision
11 May 2026
Decision
Approved
Decision date
29 Jun 2026
Agent
Roman Summer Associates Ltd

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14858232
Planning Portal ref
PP-14858232
Consultation
24 Apr 2026
Comments by
15 May 2026
Statutory expiry
11 May 2026
Env. assessment
No
Rossendale
Planning Authority Score
1/10
Poor
#293 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rossendale is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #287 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 75% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (88%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rossendale decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
86%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #197 of 296
88%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #222 of 296
27%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #287 of 296
75%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #293 of 296
85%
Minor dwellings approved
34 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
3 decided (10+ homes)
59%
Change of use approved
17 decided
231
Total decisions
33 refused in the year to March 2026