Single-storey rear extension at 96 Kenmore Avenue, Kenton

“Single storey rear extension; External alterations (Demolition of rear extension)”

“The application site contains a two-storey semi-detached house located on the Eastern side of Kenmore Avenue.”

“The proposed development is considered to be a modest and sympathetic addition which would not result in a detrimental impact to the character and appearance of the original building and the surrounding area, nor would it result in a detrimental impact to the residential amenities of neighbouring properties.”

“Accordingly, weighing up the development plan policies and proposals along with other material considerations including comments received in response to notification and consultation as set out below, Officers consider and conclude that, subject to planning conditions, the proposed development is acceptable.”

“A total of 3 consultation letters were sent to neighbouring properties regarding this application. The overall public consultation period expired on the 14 th May 2026.”

“No consultation is required or undertaken as the application site is not bound by the relevant site constraint(s).”

“The main issues are; • Character and Appearance of the Area • Impact to Residential Amenity • Development and Flood Risk • Fire Safety…”

“It is noted that this property is extended to the rear to a depth of 3 metres. Thus, the proposed extension will result in a visible flank wall of 3 metres depth. This depth accords with the Residential Design Guide and is considered acceptable. It is acknowledged that due to the bend in the shared boundary, the proposed extension will project sideways towards No.98 from approximately 3.2 metres depth onwards, to a maximum width of 0.7 metres.”

“DECISION: GRANT subject to the conditions set out in the Officer’s report and the tabled addendum.”

“The Committee wished it to be recorded that the decision to grant the application was unanimous.”