T Edson And Sons Limited Main Road Plumtree Nottinghamshire NG12 5NB Data via plota.co.uk

26/00707/DISCON - Discharge of Condition(s) Approved

Proposal

Discharge conditions 16 (Validation report for site remediation) and 17 (Evidence of Topsoil suitability) from planning permission Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
17 Apr 2026
✓
Validated
20 Apr 2026
✓
Consultation
22 Apr 2026
✓
Approved
1 Jun 2026

Approved on 1 Jun 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 5 Jul 2026

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    FullApprovedcouncil archive

    Conditions 16, 17 discharged

    • ConditionsDischarge conditions 16 (Validation report for site remediation) and 17 (Evidence of Topsoil…This application26/00707/DISCON

Site constraints 5

Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 2. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
1 listed building within 150 m of the postcode pin; Radon affected area, class 2; Coalfield, development low risk area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rushcliffe - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rushcliffe
Application type
Discharge of Condition(s)
Postcode
NG12 5NB
Received
17 Apr 2026
Validated
20 Apr 2026
Ward
Keyworth And Wolds
Parish
Plumtree
Case officer
Show
Target decision
15 Jun 2026
Decision
Conditions Discharged
Decision date
1 Jun 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Peart Bradley Architects

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
22 Apr 2026
Comments by
14 May 2026
Statutory expiry
15 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
No
Rushcliffe
Planning Authority Score
3.8/10
Below average
#208 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rushcliffe is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #233 out of 296. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rushcliffe decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #91 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #89 of 296
51%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #233 of 296
50%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #227 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
74 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
100%
Change of use approved
13 decided
761
Total decisions
60 refused in the year to March 2026