Smallbrook Cottage, HAMPTWORTH ROAD, LANDFORD, SALISBURY, SP5 2DT Data via plota.co.uk

26/00332LBC - Listed Building Consent Refused

Proposal

Replacement conservatory; decking (Application for Listed Building Consent) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
10 Apr 2026
✓
Consultation
10 Apr 2026
✓
Validated
16 Apr 2026
✓
Committee
21 Jul 2026
✗
Refused
24 Jul 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 24 Jul 2026 · Planning Committee · Last checked 26 Jul 2026

Planning committee

Decided by New Forest (Park) Planning Committee on 21 Jul 2026.

Refused unanimously

Against officer advice: officers had recommended approval.

  • Officers advised approval because the conservatory was proportionate, subservient and caused no adverse impact on the listed building.
  • The parish council objected, while no other representations were received and public participants spoke in support.
  • Members unanimously refused the application after six votes opposed the officer recommendation.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site, officer advice, local views, public speakers, committee debate, vote and refusal reasons.

Source: Plota analysis of New Forest (Park)'s committee minutes of 21 Jul 2026.

Site constraints 13

Surface water flood riskAerodrome safeguarding zoneFlood zone 3Flood zone 2Wiltshire Areas of Special Advert ControlRedl011
Grade II listed: Smallbrook Cottage
List entry 1023930 · 10 m away · 1 more listed building within 150 m (1 Grade II)
Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show the other one with distances
Historic England ↗
Nutrient neutrality catchment: Solent: Includes Chichester and Langstone Harbours SPA/Ramsar, Solent and Southampton Water SPA/Ramsar, Solent Maritime SAC, Portsmouth Harbour SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
New Forest National Park
The park authority decides applications here. Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Landscape, scenic beauty and wildlife carry great weight, and major development is only allowed in exceptional circumstances.
2 Article 4 directions
Article 4 Direction Np New Forest Campsite · Article 4 Direction Np New Forest Recreational Campsite. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Agricultural land, grade 2
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
SSSI 75 m away: The New Forest SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Surface water flood riskCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Aerodrome safeguarding zoneCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Flood zone 3Council record
The council's own flood layer for this site.
Council site ↗
Flood zone 2Council record
The council's own flood layer for this site.
Council site ↗
Wiltshire Areas of Special Advert ControlCouncil record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Redl011Council record
Recorded by the council for this site.
Council site ↗
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in New Forest (Park) - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Listed Building Consent
Postcode
SP5 2DT
Received
10 Apr 2026
Validated
16 Apr 2026
Parish
Landford Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
5 Jun 2026
Decision
Refuse
Decision date
24 Jul 2026
Decision level
Planning Committee
Applicant
Show
Agent
ACA Design Limited

How this decision compares

Decided in 99 days from validation, 50 days slower than New Forest (Park)'s median of 49 for extensions. Refused, as 9% of extensions here are.

81%decided within 8 weeks
91%approved
83%go to committee

Plota live figures for extensions decided by New Forest (Park) in the last twelve months, from validation. New Forest (Park) decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14768252_C
Comments by
15 May 2026
Site or press notice
10 Apr 2026
Committee
21 Jul 2026
New Forest (Park)
Planning Authority Score
3.3/10
Poor
#226 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

New Forest (Park) is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #254 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
New Forest (Park) decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #136 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #160 of 296
45%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #254 of 296
44%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #180 of 296
75%
Minor dwellings approved
28 decided (1-9 homes)
50%
Major dwellings approved
4 decided (10+ homes)
83%
Change of use approved
18 decided
487
Total decisions
55 refused in the year to March 2026

Freehold boundary: © Crown copyright and database rights 2026, HM Land Registry. Polygons © Crown copyright and database rights 2026 Ordnance Survey 100026316. Conditions of use