Land Adjacent Hill View, Ringwood Road, Sopley BH23 7BE (Nb: Subject to Unilateral Undertaking) Data via plota.co.uk

26/10351 - Full Planning Permission Approved

Proposal

Construction of dwelling (resubmission of ) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
10 Apr 2026
✓
Consultation
13 Apr 2026
✓
Committee
10 Jun 2026
✓
Approved
13 Jul 2026

Approved on 13 Jul 2026 · Development Control Committee · Last checked 16 Jul 2026

Planning committee

Decided by New Forest (District) Planning Committee on 10 Jun 2026.

Approved

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because the revised dwelling would avoid unacceptable harm to neighbouring amenity and other impacts could be controlled.
  • The parish council and four objectors raised concerns about scale, design, overshadowing, light, privacy and overdevelopment.
  • The committee gave delegated authority to grant permission, subject to a legal agreement and conditions.
Read how the committee decided The proposed dwelling, site history, officers’ assessment, objections, speakers and committee decision.

Source: Plota analysis of New Forest (District)'s committee minutes of 10 Jun 2026.

Documents 43

Other documents 26

PDF CIL LIABILITY NOTICE Obligation Correspondence · 15 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF UNILATERAL UNDERTAKING CONFIRMATION Applications Processing · 9 Jul 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representees · 21 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representees · 20 May 2026 View ↗
PDF TECHNICAL NOTE Applications Processing · 18 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representees · 8 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representees · 5 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representees · 1 May 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representees · 24 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Representees · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF SUNPATH STUDY 3 Submitted Applications · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF WATER QUALITY CHECKLIST Submitted Applications · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF NUTRIENT CALCULATOR Submitted Applications · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF AIR QUALITY Submitted Applications · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF COVERING LETTER Submitted Applications · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF DAYLIGHT AND SUNLIGHT STUDY Submitted Applications · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF SUNPATH STUDY 1 Submitted Applications · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF SUNPATH STUDY 2 Submitted Applications · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Granted_SUNPATH STUDY 3 Submitted Applications · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Granted_WATER QUALITY CHECKLIST Submitted Applications · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Granted_NUTRIENT CALCULATOR Submitted Applications · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Granted_AIR QUALITY Submitted Applications · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Granted_COVERING LETTER Submitted Applications · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Granted_DAYLIGHT AND SUNLIGHT STUDY Submitted Applications · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Granted_SUNPATH STUDY 1 Submitted Applications · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF Granted_SUNPATH STUDY 2 Submitted Applications · 10 Apr 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 2

  • Part of

    FullRefusedcouncil archive
    • FullConstruction of dwelling (resubmission)This application26/10351

Site constraints 8

Green belt: South West Hampshire
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm.
Nutrient neutrality catchment: River Avon SAC
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Special protection area about 125 m away: Avon Valley
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
SSSI about 125 m away: Avon Valley (Bickton to Christchurch) SSSI
Natural England may need consulting, depending on what is proposed.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Also on the record
Conservation area about 33 m away: Sopley; Inside the Sopley built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 2, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in New Forest (District) - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Planning Permission
Postcode
BH23 7BE
Received
10 Apr 2026
Validated
10 Apr 2026
Ward
Bransgore, Burley, Sopley & Ringwood Eas
Parish
Sopley
Case officer
Show
Decision
Granted Subject to Conditions
Decision date
13 Jul 2026
Decision level
Development Control Committee
Applicant
Show
Agent
Jerry Davies Planning Consultancy

How this decision compares

Decided in 94 days from validation, 30 days slower than New Forest (District)'s median of 64 for new homes. Approved, as 50% of new homes here are.

43%decided within 8 weeks
50%approved
47decided in the last year

Plota live figures for new homes decided by New Forest (District) in the last twelve months, from validation. New Forest (District) decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14847826
Consultation
13 Apr 2026
Comments by
8 May 2026
Committee
10 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
No
New Forest (District)
Planning Authority Score
7.8/10
Good
#29 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

New Forest (District) is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #37 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
New Forest (District) decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
90%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #112 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #54 of 296
80%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #37 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #103 of 296
69%
Minor dwellings approved
87 decided (1-9 homes)
91%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
78%
Change of use approved
40 decided
885
Total decisions
85 refused in the year to March 2026