Woodcock Hill Industrial Estate Harefield Road Rickmansworth Hertfordshire Data via plota.co.uk

26/0520/FUL - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Erection of 3no. three storey buildings comprising six new industrial units (Use Classes B2/B8/E(g)iii) with ancillary office space, including associated infrastructure, parking and landscaping Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
30 Mar 2026
✓
Validated
7 Apr 2026
✓
Consultation
5 May 2026
✓
Approved
15 Sept 2026

Approved on 15 Sept 2026 · Committee Decision · Last checked 16 Sept 2026

Documents 62

Statements & assessments 20

PDF AMENDED ARB METHOD STATEMENT Report · 13 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF CONSULTEE COMMENT FROM HERTS ECOLOGY Consultee Comment · 5 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF BAT EMERGENCE SURVEY Report · 4 Aug 2026 View ↗ PDF UPDATED ARB METHOD STATEMENT AND TREE REPORT Report · 6 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF COMMENT FROM HERTS ECOLOGY Consultee Comment · 24 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF UPDATED BNG MATRIX Report · 24 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF UPDATED TRANSPORT STATEMENT Report · 28 May 2026 View ↗ PDF BIODIVERSITY CHECKLIST Supporting documents · 7 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF LAND CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT Supporting documents · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PART 1 DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Supporting documents · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PART 2 DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Supporting documents · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PART 3 DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Supporting documents · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PART 4 DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Supporting documents · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF BIODIVERSITY SURVEY AND REPORT Supporting documents · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PRELIM ECOLOGICAL APPRAISAL & BIODIVERSITY NET GAIN ASSESSMENT Supporting documents · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF BIODIVERSITY METRIC CALCULATION TOOL Supporting documents · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL Supporting documents · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF PLANNING STATEMENT Supporting documents · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT Supporting documents · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF ARBORICULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Supporting documents · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗

Plans & drawings 23

PDF FIGURE 2 HIGHWAYS WORKS Drawing · 30 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF 1216-DFA-100001 AMENDED LOCATION PLAN Drawing · 3 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF 1216-DFA-10002 AMENDED ROOF PLAN Appeal Correspondence · 3 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF COMMENT FROM LOCAL PLAN Consultee Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN Supporting documents · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF TRAVEL PLAN Supporting documents · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF 1216-DFA-000001 LOCATION PLAN OS Extract · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF 1216-DFA-000002 EXISTING BLOCK PLAN Drawing · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF 1216-DFA-000003 EXISTING SITE ELEVATION & SECTION Drawing · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF 1216-DFA-100001 PROPOSED LOCATION PLAN OS Extract · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF 1216-DFA-100002 PROPOSED BLOCK PLAN Drawing · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF 1216-DFA-100003 PROPOSED GROUND FLOOR PLAN Drawing · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF 1216-DFA-100005 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN Drawing · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF 1216-DFA-100006 PROPOSED UNIT 1-2 GROUND FLOOR PLAN Drawing · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF 1216-DFA-100006 PROPOSED UNIT 3- GROUND FLOOR PLAN Drawing · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF 1216-DFA-100008 PROPOSED UNIT 5-6 GROUND FLOOR PLAN Drawing · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF 1216 -DFA -110201 PROPOSED SECTIONS Drawing · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF 1216 -DFA -110202 PROPOSED SITE SECTIONS Drawing · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF 1216-DFA-110301 PROPOSED UNIT 1-2 ELEVATIONS Drawing · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF 1216-DFA-110302 PROPOSED UNIT 3-4 ELEVATIONS Drawing · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF 1216-DFA-110303 PROPOSED UNIT 5-6 ELEVATIONS Drawing · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF 1216-DFA-110304 PROPOSED SITE ELEVATION & SECTION Drawing · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF 1216-DFA-100007 PROPOSED UNIT 3-4 GROUND FLOOR PLAN Drawing · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 5

Green belt: London
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; National infrastructure project about 830 m away: Expansion of Heathrow Airport (Third Runway), at pre-application.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Three Rivers - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Application
Postcode
WD3 1PD
Received
30 Mar 2026
Validated
7 Apr 2026
Ward
Rickmansworth Town
Parish
Batchworth Community Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
15 Sept 2026
Decision
approved
Decision date
15 Sept 2026
Decision level
Committee Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 161 days from validation, 105 days slower than Three Rivers's median of 56 for commercial premises. Approved, as 86% of commercial premises here are.

54%decided within 8 weeks
86%approved
9%go to committee

Plota live figures for commercial premises decided by Three Rivers in the last twelve months, from validation. Three Rivers decision record →

Public comments

8comments received
7 objecting1 neutral

88% object · above the UK average of 74%

29 neighbours consulted · Last counted 16 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14817301
Planning Portal ref
PP-14817301
Comments by
25 Jun 2026
Site or press notice
5 May 2026
Committee
10 Sept 2026
Statutory expiry
2 Jun 2026
Env. assessment
No
Three Rivers
Planning Authority Score
7.3/10
Good
#54 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Three Rivers is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #30 out of 296. Only 24% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (91%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Three Rivers decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #145 of 296
91%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #184 of 296
82%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #30 of 296
24%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #28 of 296
85%
Minor dwellings approved
62 decided (1-9 homes)
63%
Major dwellings approved
8 decided (10+ homes)
94%
Change of use approved
17 decided
819
Total decisions
86 refused in the year to March 2026