Accessible rear extension at 5 Montgomery Cottages Stonham Road, Mickfield, Stowmarket
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Babergh Mid Suffolk Mid Suffolk Planning Committee on 3 Jun 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed a single-storey rear extension and alterations to provide an accessible bedroom and wet room for a person with complex disabilities.
“Development of Description Householder Application - Erection of a single storey rear extension with additional adaptions to assist a person with complex needs…”
“The application seeks planning permission for the erection of a single-storey rear extension to a mid-terrace dwelling, together with associated internal and external alterations required to meet the needs of an occupant with complex disabilities.”
Officer report
The site and its history
The mid-terrace home has a long rear garden, and there was no relevant planning history.
“The application site comprises a mid-terrace dwelling forming part of a uniform row of early twentieth-century red brick properties with pitched tiled roofs. The surrounding area is rural- residential in character, with similar terraced housing and modest front curtilages providing off- street parking.”
“The site benefits from a long rear garden, containing domestic paraphernalia, a timber shed and other incidental outbuildings. Boundary treatments consist of timber fencing and mature vegetation, including established trees that provide screening between neighbouring plots.”
Officer report
Members’ discussion
The case officer answered questions about how long the current residents had lived at the property and whether alternative accommodation had been considered.
“The Case Officer introduced the application to the Committee outlining the proposal before Members including: the reason for referral to Committee, the location of the site, the site constraints, the ownership of the site, the red line plan, the proposed site layout plan, the relocation of the Air Source Heat Pump, the proposed floor plan, the proposed elevations, and the Officer recommendation of approval as detailed in the report.”
“The Case Officer responded to questions from Members regarding the length of time the current residents had resided at the property and whether any alternative accommodation had been considered.”
Minutes
The committee’s decision
Councillor Carter proposed approval, Councillor Marriott seconded it, and Members unanimously granted permission with conditions and informatives.
“Councillor Carter proposed that the application be approved as detailed in the Officer recommendation. Councillor Marriott seconded the proposal.”
“That Members GRANT planning permission subject to the following conditions and informatives and any others as may be deemed necessary by the Chief Planning Officer:”
Minutes
Sources
- Babergh Mid Suffolk Mid Suffolk Planning Committee minutes, 3 June 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Babergh Mid Suffolk's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Babergh Mid Suffolk
- Date
- Wednesday 3 June 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Babergh Mid Suffolk committee decisions →
This committee's year
25 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.