8 Belle Vue Lowton Warrington WA3 1BN Data via plota.co.uk

A/26/100488/FULL - Full Details Approved

Proposal

Change of use of land to accommodate a short stay holiday let accommodation comprising of a shepherd's hut, gazebo and associated landscape works (retrospective application) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
20 Feb 2026
✓
Validated
23 Mar 2026
✓
Consultation
6 May 2026
✓
Committee
4 Aug 2026
✓
Approved
5 Aug 2026

Approved on 5 Aug 2026 · Committee Decision · Last checked 6 Aug 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Wigan Planning Committee on 4 Aug 2026.

Approved

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because the small-scale holiday let supported outdoor recreation, preserved Green Belt openness and had acceptable impacts.
  • Objectors raised concerns about the Green Belt, ecology, drainage, access, amenity, utilities, ownership and consultation; supporters described a discreet tourism use.
  • The committee voted 13 to 1 for approval, with no abstentions, and granted permission subject to conditions.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officers’ assessment, consultation responses, public views, speakers, committee decision and conditions.

Source: Plota analysis of Wigan's committee minutes of 4 Aug 2026.

Documents 66

Consultation & comments 54

PDF OBJECTION LETTERS REDACTED Neighbour Letter · 27 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION LETTERS REDACTED Neighbour Letter · 27 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION LETTERS REDACTED Neighbour Letter · 27 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF LLFA SECOND COMMENTS Consultation Correspondence · 3 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF TREE OFFICER COMMENTS Consultation Correspondence · 3 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF COMMENTS IN RESPONSE TO OFFICER QUERIES Case Officer Correspondence · 21 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 6 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 6 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 4 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 4 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 4 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 4 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 4 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 4 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 4 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 4 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 4 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 4 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 3 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 3 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 3 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 3 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 2 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 2 May 2026 View ↗ PDF OBJECTION LETTER Neighbour Letter · 2 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 1 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 1 May 2026 View ↗ PDF NG RESPONSE Consultee Reply · 1 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 1 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 1 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 1 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 1 May 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 30 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 29 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 29 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 29 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 25 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 25 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 23 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 22 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 21 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 20 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 20 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 18 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 17 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 17 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 16 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 16 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF PROW COMMENTS Consultee Reply · 15 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 15 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 13 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF ONLINE COMMENT Public Comment · 13 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF NGT RESPONSE Consultee Reply · 7 Apr 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 5

Green belt: Merseyside and Greater Manchester
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm.
Public footpath about 20 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 1
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
National nature reserve about 388 m away: The Flashes of Wigan and Leigh; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Wigan - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Wigan
Application type
Full Details
Postcode
WA3 1BN
Received
20 Feb 2026
Validated
23 Mar 2026
Ward
Lowton East
Parish
Golborne And Lowton Township
Case officer
Show
Target decision
18 May 2026
Decision
Approved with Conditions
Decision date
5 Aug 2026
Decision level
Committee Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
JT Design Consultancy

How this decision compares

Decided in 135 days from validation, 72 days slower than Wigan's median of 63 for changes of use. Approved, as 51% of changes of use here are.

46%decided within 8 weeks
51%approved
69decided in the last year

Plota live figures for changes of use decided by Wigan in the last twelve months, from validation. Wigan decision record →

Public comments

40comments received
14 objecting26 supporting

65% support · above the UK average of 16%

44 neighbours consulted · Last counted 6 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14722638
Neighbours
27 Jul 2026
Consultation
6 May 2026
Comments by
27 May 2026
Site or press notice
14 Apr 2026
Committee
4 Aug 2026
Env. assessment
No
Wigan
Planning Authority Score
2/10
Poor
#273 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Change of use

Wigan is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #216 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 57% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (87%) than the national average (90%).

Frequently extends decision deadlines
expect longer than the statutory limit
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Wigan decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
85%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #213 of 296
87%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #236 of 296
54%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #216 of 296
57%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #262 of 296
70%
Minor dwellings approved
69 decided (1-9 homes)
94%
Major dwellings approved
16 decided (10+ homes)
60%
Change of use approved
50 decided
708
Total decisions
109 refused in the year to March 2026