Land To The North Of Common Road Dickleburgh Norfolk Data via plota.co.uk

2026/0736 - Full Refused

Proposal

Erection of 3no. bungalows and garages Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
17 Mar 2026
✓
Validated
30 Mar 2026
✓
Consultation
9 Jun 2026
✓
Committee
29 Jul 2026
✗
Refused
31 Jul 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 31 Jul 2026 · Last checked 30 Sept 2026

Planning committee

Decided by South Norfolk Broadland South Norfolk Development Management (Planning) Committee on 29 Jul 2026.

Refused

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised refusal because the site was unsustainable, harmed rural character and required hedgerow removal.
  • The parish council raised concerns about rural character, spacing, water efficiency, hedgerows, views and green corridors; one letter supported the proposal.
  • Members voted for refusal by five votes to four, with the Chair using a casting vote.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site, officers’ assessment, consultation responses, objections and the committee’s refusal decision.

Source: Plota analysis of South Norfolk Broadland's committee minutes of 29 Jul 2026.

Documents 38

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 1

Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in South Norfolk Broadland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full
Postcode
IP21 4PJ
Received
17 Mar 2026
Validated
30 Mar 2026
Ward
Beck Vale, Dickleburgh And Scole
Parish
Dickleburgh And Rushall
Case officer
Show
Target decision
31 Jul 2026
Decision
Refusal
Decision date
31 Jul 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
WT Design Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 123 days from validation, 32 days slower than South Norfolk Broadland's median of 91 for new homes. Refused, as 34% of new homes here are.

24%decided within 8 weeks
66%approved
83decided in the last year

Plota live figures for new homes decided by South Norfolk Broadland in the last twelve months, from validation. South Norfolk Broadland decision record →

Public comments

1comment received
1 supporting

8 neighbours consulted · Last counted 30 Sept 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14694880
Neighbours
2 Apr 2026
Consultation
9 Jun 2026
Comments by
30 Jun 2026
Site or press notice
13 Apr 2026
Committee
29 Jul 2026
Env. assessment
No
South Norfolk Broadland
Planning Authority Score
5.9/10
Average
#106 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

South Norfolk Broadland ranks #136 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
South Norfolk Broadland decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #50 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #71 of 296
67%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #136 of 296
42%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #161 of 296
82%
Minor dwellings approved
137 decided (1-9 homes)
92%
Major dwellings approved
12 decided (10+ homes)
100%
Change of use approved
33 decided
1,013
Total decisions
67 refused in the year to March 2026