Replacement play structure at Lower Leas Coastal Park, Lower Sandgate Road, Folkestone

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Shepway Planning and Licensing Committee on 17 Mar 2026.

25/2080/FHApproved

What was proposed

A smaller replacement play structure with towers, slides, rope bridges, a trampoline and climbing wall would be built from Robinia hardwood.

“Proposal 3.1. Planning permission is sought for the installation of replacement play equipment on a smaller footprint than the existing, set away from the cliff face and to the north of Lower Sandgate Road. The proposed equipment would comprise a series of towers, slides, rope bridges, a trampoline and a climbing wall at a maximum height of 8.6m.”

“DC/25/45 Figure 4: Elevation 1 involves the use of high tensile mesh, soil nailing and draped netting to prevent any future landslips. It is proposed that the new play equipment would be constructed once these works are completed. Figure 3 below details the proposed site layout and Figures 4 and 5 show the elevations of the proposed replacement play structure.”

Officer report

Earlier site history

A previous application for play equipment, an amphitheatre and part of the Zig Zag path was approved.

“99/0939/SH Erection of play equipment, construction of an amphitheatre, and replacement of a section of the Zig Zag path (regulation 3)”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the proposal would be high quality, preserve the conservation area, and avoid harm to heritage, homes, biodiversity and slope stability.

“DC/25/45 and the proposed design and materials would be of a high quality. The proposal would not result in harm to the significance of nearby Listed Buildings and would preserve the character and appearance of the Conservation Area. The proposal would not be harmful to residential amenity or biodiversity and matters relating to slope stability are appropriately mitigated.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

Folkestone Town Council and the Environmental Protection Officer raised no objection, while ecology officers accepted the assessment and sought biodiversity net gain clarification.

“KCC Ecology: Satisfied with the conclusions of the Ecological Impact Assessment that there are no requirements for protected/notable surveys to be carried out. However, clarification has been sought by KCC Ecology as to whether the site would be exempt from Biodiversity Net Gain. They have requested additional site photos which have been provided an update on this matter will be given at the meeting.”

“Environmental Protection Officer: No objection. Proposal is not expected to result in an unacceptable impact on the amenity of nearby residential properties.”

Officer report

Comments from neighbours

One hundred and fourteen neighbours were consulted, but no comments had been received by the report’s stated response date.

“Public/Neighbour Consultation 5.2. 114 neighbours directly consulted and a site notice has been displayed at the site. The latest response date for comments is 5 th March 2026. No comments have been received at the time of writing this report, however, should any be received, Members will be updated at the meeting. Responses are available in full on the planning file on the Council’s website:”

Officer report

Committee discussion

The Planning Officer advised that KCC Ecology considered the site exempt from biodiversity net gain.

“The Planning Officer advised the Committee that KCC Ecology have confirmed they consider the site exempt from biodiversity net gain.”

Minutes

The decision

Planning permission was granted subject to conditions, with delegated authority to finalise their wording and add necessary conditions.

“That planning permission be granted subject to the conditions set out at the end of the report and that delegated authority be given to the Chief Planning Officer to agree and finalise the wording of the conditions and add any other conditions that he considers necessary.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Shepway Planning and Licensing Committee minutes, 17 March 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Shepway's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Shepway
Date
Tuesday 17 March 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Vote
11 for, 0 against
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of the minutes.

This committee's year

19 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →