Mixed-use building at T A Boxall & Co, Horley

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Reigate Planning Committee on 9 Sept 2026.

26/00013/FApproved

What was proposed

The application proposed demolishing existing buildings and constructing a four-storey mixed-use building with flexible commercial space, eight flats, parking and landscaping.

“This is a full planning application for demolition of all existing buildings on the site and the erection of a four storey building in a mix of uses comprising of a ground floor flexible Class E use, with 8 residential flats above, together with parking for both the commercial and residential uses and landscaping. The application follows a similar one, made last year under reference 24/00570/F, refused for design and amenity issues.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The site contained former engineering-related workshops, offices and storage buildings within a safeguarded employment area beside residential and commercial uses.

“The site is located within the Bridge Industrial Area – Balcombe Road, a designated and safeguarded employment area within the RBBC DMP, which extends to the north and west of the site comprising a range of industrial and other commercial…”

“Planning Committee Agenda Item: 6 9 September 2026 26/00013/F uses. Located on the edge of the estate, adjacent to other residential uses, it is considered to be appropriate for residential use which would otherwise be resisted in a designated employment area. Adjacent to the site to the rear, within the industrial estate is the former Horley Brewery, a locally listed building in the 1870s high gothic style.”

Officer report

Earlier applications

A similar 2025 application was refused for an incongruous design and poor accommodation, while earlier permissions related to workshop and nearby redevelopment schemes.

“24/00570/F Demolition of existing buildings and redevelopment of site to provide a mixed-use building comprising ground and first floor flexible Class E use and eight C3 residential apartments with associated vehicle parking, landscaping, and other Refused 21/07/2025”

“The previous recent application (ref: 24/00570/F) for the demolition of existing buildings and redevelopment of site to provide a mixed-use building comprising ground and first floor flexible Class E use and eight C3 residential apartments with associated vehicle parking, landscaping, and other required works was refused for the following reasons:”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers considered the proposal acceptable on design, housing, noise, air quality, neighbour amenity, highways, flooding and sustainability grounds, subject to conditions.

“It is considered that the noise impact, principally from road traffic, needs to be mitigated by an insulation condition. The impact from noise created by the proposal can be controlled by conditions in respect of a delivery and service management plan, opening hours and for details of all mechanical plantwork.”

“Issues around neighbour amenity, flooding, sustainability and energy are considered acceptable, subject to the imposition of appropriate conditions.”

Officer report

Consultation responses

The town council and highways authority raised no objection, while consultees sought conditions covering flooding, contamination, noise, accessibility and signage.

“Regulatory Support Services (RSS) - the Council’s noise consultant: No objection subject to conditions.”

“The Noise Impact Assessment Report identifies the development site as heavily impacted by road traffic noise and therefore measures will be required to ensure the proposed dwellings are provided with appropriate noise mitigation and ventilation measures. Controls will also be required to limit the impact of plant and delivery noise, including conditions to limit hours of operation and for deliveries.”

Officer report

What people objected to

One neighbouring response objected to parking, traffic, noise, deliveries, highway safety, privacy, light, overshadowing, overbearing effects and design.

“Issue Response Inadequate parking See paragraph 6.67 No need for the development See paragraphs 6.5, 6.16 and 6.38 Increase in traffic and congestion…”

“See paragraph 6.69 Noise & disturbance See paragraphs 6.44-6.48 and 6.61 Deliveries at unsociable hours See paragraphs 6.61 and 6.69 Hazard to highway safety - the proposed site entrance would increase the risk of accidents at a junction known for numerous accidents.”

Officer report

What members discussed

Members discussed the limited parking and whether delivery lorries could manoeuvre safely, with tracking accepted by the Highway Authority.

“There was concern raised regarding the lack of parking at the site, however this was not raised as a concern by Surrey Highways due to it being a town centre location. There was also concern raised regarding the delivery lorry being able to manoeuvre when delivering to the store. Tracking showed this was acceptable to the Highway Authority.”

Minutes

The committee’s decision

The committee granted permission subject to the recommended conditions, an amendment to condition 14 and an additional privacy-screen condition.

“RESOLVED that planning permission be GRANTED subject to conditions as per the recommendation and subject to an amendment to condition 14 and an additional condition requiring terrace/balcony screens to the sides of the front and rear as follows:”

“Notwithstanding the plans hereby approved and prior to first occupation of the flats, details of privacy screens to the sides of the front and rear terraces and balconies shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The privacy screens shall be installed prior to first occupation of the flats and thereafter maintained and retained in accordance with the approved details.”

Minutes

Sources

  • Reigate Planning Committee minutes, 9 September 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Reigate's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Reigate
Date
Wednesday 9 September 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

26 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →