Solar panels at Bexhill Leisure Pool Ravenside Retail & Leisure Park, Bexhill-on-Sea
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Rother Planning Committee on 16 Apr 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought a determination on whether prior approval was needed for photovoltaic solar panels on the pool’s eastern and southern roofs.
“This application seeks to determine if 'Prior Approval' is required for the installation of photovoltaic (PV) solar panels on the eastern and southern roofslope of the pool building.”
Officer report
The site
Bexhill Leisure Pool is in the south-east corner of a retail and leisure park beside roads, parking, an open field, railway tracks and the beach.
“Bexhill Leisure Pool is located in the south-east corner of Ravenside Retail and Leisure Park, adjacent to Hastings Road, a small carpark and an open field to the north-east of the building, and bound by a trade access, the railway track and the beach to its south.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
The report records two earlier applications concerning redevelopment, landscaping, access arrangements and part of the existing car park at the retail and leisure park.
“RR/2000/2798/P Outline: Redevelopment to provide new retail warehouse and A3 unit, with landscaping, new access arrangements and rearrangement of part of existing car park area at Ravenside Retail and Leisure Park.”
“RR/2003/3038/P Redevelopment of existing premises to provide new retail warehouse and A3 unit together with landscaping, new access arrangements and rearrangement of part of existing car park area at Ravenside Retail and Leisure Park pursuant to outline consent RR/2000/2798/P.”
Officer report
Officers’ recommendation
Officers found the modern panels acceptable in the commercial urban setting, with no significant glare, and recommended that prior approval was not required.
“RR/2026/0183/NPV as to the design or external appearance of the development, in particular the impact of glare on occupiers of neighbouring land.”
“Overall, owing to the modern character of the buildings, and having regard to the commercial and urban character of the wider locality, the design and appearance of the solar panels is considered acceptable. Furthermore, the proposal does not give rise to any significant issues in terms of glare. The recommendation therefore is: Prior Approval is not Required.”
Officer report
Why officers supported it
The panels met the permitted development criteria, would fit the site’s commercial character and faced open land, railway tracks and beach rather than homes.
“APPRAISAL 7.1 The installation of solar panels is permitted development under Schedule 2, Part 14, Class J of the GPDO, subject to it meeting the prescribed criteria for installation. As per the submission, the proposed development would comply with the prescribed criteria for permitted development i.e.”
“Moreover, as there are no residential properties neighbouring the site, and with the proposed solar panels facing the open green to the east, and the railway tracks and beach to the south, the development is not considered to give rise to significant glare impacts.”
Officer report
Public response
No public representations were received after the required 21-day site notice, and no other formal consultation was required.
“No other formal consultation is required by the legislation.”
Officer report
Committee discussion
The committee supported the planning officer’s recommendation, subject to the stated reason.
“This application was presented to the Planning Committee as it was a Rother District Council application located on Council-owned land.”
“The Planning Committee was supportive of the Planning Officer’s recommendation, subject to the reason as outlined below.”
Minutes
The vote
Councillor Mrs Cook moved the motion, Councillor McLaren seconded it, and the motion carried unanimously with nine votes in favour.
“Councillor Mrs Cook moved the motion that PRIOR APPROVAL WAS NOT REQUIRED subject to the reason as outlined below and this was seconded by Councillor McLaren. The motion was declared CARRIED (9 for / unanimous).”
Minutes
The decision
The committee decided that prior approval was not required because the panels’ design and appearance were acceptable and glare impacts were not significant.
“As per Class J of Part 14, Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended), the design and appearance of the proposed solar panels, located on a modern leisure facility within a business park and presenting no significant glare impacts, is considered acceptable. Prior approval is therefore not required, and the proposal would constitute permitted development.”
Minutes
Decision note
The decision states that the PV panels must be removed as soon as reasonably practicable when they are no longer needed.
“This decision relates to the following plans and documents: Site Location and Block Plan: 5164-100, dated February 2026 Proposed-Roof-Plan: 5164-330, dated February 2026 Proposed Elevations – North and South, 5164-340, dated February 2026 Proposed Elevations – East and West: 5164-341, dated February 2026 A&M Covering Letter: Ref.5164, Issue 1, dated 11 February 2026”
“The PV solar panels shall be removed as soon as reasonably practicable when no longer needed, as per the requirements set out in Class J.4 (1) (b) of the Town & Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 (as amended).”
Minutes
Sources
- Rother Planning Committee minutes, 16 April 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Rother's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Rother Planning Committee
- Council
- Rother
- Date
- Thursday 16 April 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Rother committee decisions →
This committee's year
30 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.