OLD PARK PALE Mountfield Lane, Mountfield, Robertsbridge, East Sussex, TN32 5LD Data via plota.co.uk

RR/2026/0473/HOU - Householder Planning Approved

Proposal

Proposed single-storey rear extension, including wood burning stove. Lowering of the existing kitchen floor level to match the floor level of the proposed extension. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
9 Apr 2026
✓
Approved
21 Aug 2026

Approved on 21 Aug 2026 · Delegated decision · Last checked 1 Oct 2026

Documents 29

Statements & assessments 2

Plans & drawings 22

PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 131_p2 Proposed Sections CC DD.pdf Plans · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 130_p2 Proposed Sections AA BB.pdf Plans · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 121_p2 Proposed Northeast and Southwest Elevations.pdf Plans · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 120_p2 Proposed Northwest and Southeast Elevations.pdf Plans · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF WITHDRAWN (Second App) 1167 OPP 113_p2 Proposed Basement Plan.pdf Plans · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 114_p2 Proposed Roof Plan.pdf Plans · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF WITHDRAWN (Second App) 1167 OPP 112_p2 Proposed Second floor Plan.pdf Plans · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 110_p2 Proposed Ground floor Plan.pdf Plans · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 111_p2 Proposed First floor Plan.pdf Plans · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 102_p2 Proposed Site Plan 1_200.pdf Block Plan · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 101_p2 Proposed Site Plan 1_500.pdf Block Plan · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 021 Existing Northeast and Southwest Elevations.pdf Plans · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 030 Existing Sections AA BB.pdf Plans · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 014 Existing Basement Plan.pdf Plans · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 020 Existing Northwest and Southeast Elevations.pdf Plans · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 012 Existing Second floor Plan.pdf Plans · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 013 Existing Roof Plan.pdf Plans · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 011 Existing First floor Plan.pdf Plans · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 010 Existing Ground floor Plan.pdf Plans · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 002 Existing Site Plan 1-200.pdf Block Plan · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 001 Existing Site Plan 1-500.pdf Block Plan · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗ PDF (Second App) 1167 OPP 000 Location Plan 1-1250.pdf Site Location Plan · 9 Apr 2026 View ↗

Consultation & comments 1

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Planning Document Public · 27 Jul 2026 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 4

High Weald National Landscape
Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
Agricultural land, grade 4
Poor quality farmland, not best and most versatile. Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
1 listed building within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: Park Pale, Grade II, about 46 m from the postcode pin
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Historic England ↗
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rother - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rother
Application type
Householder Planning
Postcode
TN32 5LD
Received
9 Apr 2026
Validated
9 Apr 2026
Parish
Mountfield
Case officer
Show
Target decision
21 Aug 2026
Decision
Approved with Conditions
Decision date
21 Aug 2026
Decision level
Delegated decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Theis + Khan

How this decision compares

Decided in 134 days from validation, 57 days slower than Rother's median of 77 for extensions. Approved, as 92% of extensions here are.

31%decided within 8 weeks
92%approved
555decided in the last year

Plota live figures for extensions decided by Rother in the last twelve months, from validation. Rother decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
21 Aug 2026
Rother
Planning Authority Score
2.5/10
Poor
#252 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rother is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #292 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 71% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rother decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #141 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #88 of 296
25%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #292 of 296
71%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #287 of 296
72%
Minor dwellings approved
127 decided (1-9 homes)
89%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
86%
Change of use approved
36 decided
739
Total decisions
84 refused in the year to March 2026