Tendring planning committee

Councillor Maurice Alexander

Member, Planning Committee

Seen at planning committee from June 2025 to October 2026

  • 100%attendance
  • 3recorded votes
  • 15agreed, no vote against recorded
  • 32decisions at their meetings
  • 8motions proposed

Councillor's page on the council's website

As at 14 October 2026, according to Plota’s analysis of Tendring’s published minutes, Councillor Maurice Alexander attended 15 of the 15 planning committee meetings whose minutes list them, from June 2025 to October 2026. Each member's vote is recorded on 3 decisions at those meetings: Alexander voted for the resolution on all 3. On 3 of those votes the officers’ recommendation is known, and none went against it. On 15 other decisions the minutes record no vote against, so Alexander is counted as agreeing; they are left out of the shares below. Alexander proposed 8 motions the committee passed and seconded 12.

Meetings attended
15 of 15100%
Meetings whose minutes list them as present, sending apologies or absent. Minutes that list only those present cannot show an absence.
Decisions at their meetings
32
Applications decided at the meetings they sat on, as the minutes record them.
Recorded votes
3
Decisions where the minutes, the council's recorded vote or the meeting's recording give each member's vote: 3 for, 0 against, 0 abstained.
Agreed, no vote against recorded
15
Decisions the minutes record with no vote against and no count. Counted as agreeing, and left out of the shares.
Proposed or seconded
8 / 12
Motions the minutes say they proposed, then seconded, that the committee passed.
Declared interests
1
Decisions on which the minutes record them declaring an interest.

Voting record

Votes by quarter

Not drawn: 3 recorded votes is too few to show a pattern over time.

Against officer advice

Not drawn: 3 recorded votes with a known officers’ recommendation is too few to compare.

Agreement with other members

Not drawn: the minutes record no divided vote of this councillor by name. On a unanimous vote every member agrees, so it says nothing about agreement.

Motions they proposed

5 of the 8 motions Alexander proposed were to approve, 1 to refuse, 2 to defer.

The outcome of each motion the minutes say Alexander proposed and the committee passed.

Approved 5Refused 1Deferred 2

Attendance

100%

15 of 15 meetings whose minutes list them.

The typical member of this committee attended 82% (the median of 10 members listed at 5 or more meetings).

Every meeting

Each square is a meeting whose minutes list them, oldest first.

Present
20252026

Planning Committee: 15 meetings

Show as a table
Every meeting
DateCommitteeAttendance
14 Oct 2026Planning CommitteePresent
3 Sep 2026Planning CommitteePresent
7 Jul 2026Planning CommitteePresent
9 Jun 2026Planning CommitteePresent
12 May 2026Planning CommitteePresent
14 Apr 2026Planning CommitteePresent
17 Mar 2026Planning CommitteePresent
19 Feb 2026Planning CommitteePresent
20 Jan 2026Planning CommitteePresent
27 Nov 2025Planning CommitteePresent
30 Oct 2025Planning CommitteePresent
2 Sep 2025Planning CommitteePresent
5 Aug 2025Planning CommitteePresent
8 Jul 2025Planning CommitteePresent
10 Jun 2025Planning CommitteePresent

Decisions

Every application decided at a meeting they sat on, newest first, with their vote where the minutes give it.

Show
Their vote
Outcome

In the minutes

What the minutes record Alexander moving, seconding, asking or saying on each decision, in the minutes’ own words. Passages that name more than one councillor, or a member of the public, are left out.

How this is worked out

Everything here is read from Tendring’s published planning committee minutes, 15 meetings from June 2025 to October 2026. A councillor is matched across meetings by the council’s own member number where it has one, otherwise by full name.

Each vote shows how it is known. Named in the minutes: the minutes, or the council’s own recorded vote, list each member with their vote. From the count and the names: the minutes give the numbers and name the members in the minority, and every member present is known. All members present in favour: the minutes say every member voted for it and the members present are known. No vote against recorded: the minutes record the decision with no vote against, no abstention and no count, at a council whose minutes print a divided vote when there is one, so each member present is counted for. Unanimous vote: the minutes call the decision unanimous, or give a count with no one against and no one abstaining, and each member present is counted for. From the meeting recording: the vote was heard on the council’s recording of the meeting and closes exactly with the members present. Where none of these holds, the vote is left as “Not recorded” and is not counted.

Votes are on the resolution the committee passed, so a vote for is a vote with the majority. A vote is a decision on the application in front of the committee, not a statement of the councillor’s views. A percentage is shown only with five or more votes, decisions or meetings behind it.

Source: Plota analysis of the council’s minutes. The party is from the council’s own list of councillors.

Also on this committee

All Tendring committee councillors