70 homes at Land At Kitchen Avenue, Bishop Auckland
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Durham Area Planning Committee (South and West) on 17 Sept 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed 70 homes, including bungalows, houses and seven affordable homes, with access, parking, footpaths, landscaping and drainage infrastructure.
“The application seeks full planning permission for the erection of 70no. dwellings in the form of 7no. two bed bungalows, 10no. two bed dwellings, 38no. three bed dwellings and 15no. four bed dwellings. It is proposed that the scheme will deliver 7no. affordable units, to be secured via a Section 106 agreement.”
“Vehicular access to the site is via Kitchen Avenue and Cheesmond Avenue. 185No. dedicated car parking spaces (including 46no. garage spaces) as well as a small element of visitor parking bays (able to accommodate 18No cars) are proposed. A dedicated SUDs and amenity green space is located to the north of the site’s access.”
Officer report
The site and surroundings
The 2.56-hectare site lies within the built-up settlement, on grassed land formerly occupied by housing, near schools, colleges, homes, allotments and a public footpath.
“The application site measures approximately 2.56 ha and is located to the south east of St John’s School and Sixth Form College, within the built-up settlement of Bishop Auckland. The site contains an existing road network including Kitchen Avenue and Cheesmond Avenue which previously served housing situated within the site. The properties were demolished following an approval in 2004, under planning reference 3/DE/2004/08.”
“The site is surrounded by residential dwellings to the south and east, Saint Wildred’s Catholic Primary School sits adjacent to the northern boundary of the site with Woodhouse Close allotments beyond. St John’s School and Sixth Form college, and Bishop Aucland College are located to the west of the site, along with residential dwellings at Teesdale Walk.”
Officer report
Earlier use of the site
Existing homes were demolished after prior approval in 2004, and the site was later assessed as difficult to deliver because of its poor market area.
“An application for prior approval (Ref: DE/3/2004/0008) was approved in July 2004 for the demolition of existing residential properties on the site.”
Officer report
What officers recommended
Officers recommended approval because the site was sustainable, policy requirements were met, and the benefits of 70 homes outweighed remaining design concerns.
“The NPPF is a material consideration in planning decisions. It is acknowledged that this proposal is not an allocated housing site under CDP Policy 4. However, CDP Policy 6 does permit development on unallocated sites on the basis that specific criteria are met.”
“Whilst there remains concerns regarding the layout of the proposed scheme, these relate to physical and financial constraints associated with the site. Such harms are outweighed by the delivery of 70 dwellings, including 7 bungalows suitable for older people, affordable housing provision and exceeding the policy requirement for Building Regulations M4(2) requirements on a site that had previously been considered as being ‘unlikely to be attractive to the development…”
Officer report
What consultees said
Statutory, internal and external consultees raised no objections, subject to conditions or financial contributions for matters including drainage, education, healthcare and biodiversity.
“Coal Authority – No objection subject to the imposition of conditions…”
“External Consultee Responses: 37. NHS North East and North Cumbria Integrated Care Board – No objection subject to a financial contribution of £39,445 towards increasing GP Surgery capacity. The sum can be secured by a Section 106 Agreement. Public Responses:”
Officer report
What people said
One public representation raised concerns that a bend in Cheesmond Avenue was too narrow for safe parking and vehicle circulation.
“One representation was received in response to the consultation exercise with the main concern being that the bend in Cheesmond Avenue (Murray Avenue). fronting existing properties, is narrow and cars cannot park and circulate in this area safely.”
Officer report
The committee’s decision
A motion to approve the application was proposed and seconded, then passed when the committee voted.
“Councillor A Savory noted that she welcomed the addition of 70 properties on a disused site, offering a number of affordable properties and helping the local community through s106 contributions. Accordingly, she moved that the application be approved as per the Officer’s report. Councillor A Schulman seconded the motion for approval and upon a vote being taken it was:”
“That the application be APPROVED, subject to the conditions and s106 Legal Agreement as set out within the report.”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Liz BrownLib DemFor(no vote against recorded)
- Liz MaddisonIndependentFor(no vote against recorded)
- Mark RowneyReform UKFor(no vote against recorded)
- Anita SavoryIndependentFor(no vote against recorded)
- Adrian SchulmanReform UKFor(no vote against recorded)
- Michael SteadLib DemFor(no vote against recorded)
The minutes record this decision with no vote against, so each member present for this item is shown as voting for it.
Apologies Richard Bell Conservative, Paul Mountford Reform UK
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Durham Area Planning Committee (South and West) minutes, 17 September 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Durham's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Durham
- Date
- Thursday 17 September 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Councillors
- 6Independent 2Lib Dem 2Reform UK 2Show votes
- Public speakers
- None
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- The application (council website)
- All decisions
- Durham committee decisions →
This committee's year
18 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 5 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.