
Brent planning committee
Councillor Matt Kelcher
LabourSeen at planning committee from June 2025 to February 2026
- 83%attendance
- 2recorded votes
- 4agreed, no vote against recorded
- 9decisions at their meetings
As at 5 August 2026, according to Plota’s analysis of Brent’s published minutes, Councillor Matt Kelcher attended 5 of the 6 planning committee meetings whose minutes list them, from June 2025 to February 2026, in the chair at 5. Each member's vote is recorded on 2 decisions at those meetings: Kelcher voted for the resolution on both. On 2 of those votes the officers’ recommendation is known, and none went against it. On 4 other decisions the minutes record no vote against, so Kelcher is counted as agreeing; they are left out of the shares below.
- Meetings attended
- 5 of 683%
- Meetings whose minutes list them as present, sending apologies or absent. Minutes that list only those present cannot show an absence.
- Decisions at their meetings
- 9
- Applications decided at the meetings they sat on, as the minutes record them.
- Recorded votes
- 2
- Decisions where the minutes, the council's recorded vote or the meeting's recording give each member's vote: 2 for, 0 against, 0 abstained.
- Agreed, no vote against recorded
- 4
- Decisions the minutes record with no vote against and no count. Counted as agreeing, and left out of the shares.
- Declared interests
- 1
- Decisions on which the minutes record them declaring an interest.
Voting record
Votes by quarter
Not drawn: 2 recorded votes is too few to show a pattern over time.
Against officer advice
Not drawn: 2 recorded votes with a known officers’ recommendation is too few to compare.
Agreement with other members
Not drawn: the minutes record no divided vote of this councillor by name. On a unanimous vote every member agrees, so it says nothing about agreement.
Attendance
83%
5 of 6 meetings whose minutes list them; apologies for 1.
The typical member of this committee attended 100% (the median of 8 members listed at 5 or more meetings).
Every meeting
Each square is a meeting whose minutes list them, oldest first.
Planning Committee: 5 meetings
Show as a table
| Date | Committee | Attendance |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Feb 2026 | Planning Committee | Present, Chair |
| 10 Dec 2025 | Planning Committee | Present, Chair |
| 12 Nov 2025 | Planning Committee | Present, Chair |
| 10 Sep 2025 | Planning Committee | Apologies |
| 4 Aug 2025 | Planning Committee | Present, Chair |
| 11 Jun 2025 | Planning Committee | Present, Chair |
Decisions
Every application decided at a meeting they sat on, newest first, with their vote where the minutes give it.
- 7 Randall Avenue, LondonBackland family dwelling · 25/1029 Approved ForUnanimous vote
- North Eastern Lands (Plots NE04, NE05 and NE06) - Land bound by Engineers Way to the south and Fulton Road to the North and East, WembleyTemporary sports and events venue · 25/3070 Approved ForUnanimous vote
- Little Trainers Playgroup and Hazel Road Community Centre, 26 Hazel Road and Harriet Tubman House, 28 Hazel Road, LondonFour-storey community building · 25/0041Declared an interest Approved Not recordedThe minutes do not say how each member voted
- 37 Lydford Road, LondonThree-storey dwelling alterations · 25/0357 Approved Not recordedThe minutes do not say how each member voted
- Argenta House, Argenta Way, London180 affordable homes · 25/1355 Approved ForAll members present in favour
- 82 Chevening Road, LondonSide, rear and basement extensions · 25/0422 Approved ForUnanimous vote
- 81 Balmoral Road, LondonSeven-bedroom HMO conversion · 25/0938 Approved ForAll members present in favour
- Matalan Discount Club, Cricklewood Broadway, LondonStudent accommodation and shops · 25/0413 Approved Not recordedThe minutes do not say how each member voted
- 96, 96A-B, High Road, London25 homes and commercial space · 24/1735 Approved ForUnanimous vote
No decision matches these filters.
In the minutes
What the minutes record Kelcher moving, seconding, asking or saying on each decision, in the minutes’ own words. Passages that name more than one councillor, or a member of the public, are left out.
Subjects in what the minutes record
- Design, scale and character11 Feb 2026, 12 Nov 2025
- Parking and traffic11 Feb 2026
- Heritage11 Feb 2026
- Housing need and affordable homes4 Aug 2025
- Asked about heritage
“The Chair then sought views on whether the objector considered that the entire building possessed a level of heritage significance that justified the high score he had attributed to it.”
Minutes, 11 Feb 2026, Little Trainers Playgroup and Hazel Road Community Centre, 26 Hazel Road and Harriet Tubman House, 28 Hazel Road, London - Asked a question
“The Chair questioned whether, in the objector’s view, any such additional benefits could outweigh the harm identified, or whether the demolition of the existing building would be so harmful that no benefit could outweigh it.”
Minutes, 11 Feb 2026, Little Trainers Playgroup and Hazel Road Community Centre, 26 Hazel Road and Harriet Tubman House, 28 Hazel Road, London - Asked a question
“The Chair then asked the Ward Councillors for their views on whether significant public realm improvements in the immediate locality could alter their position.”
Minutes, 11 Feb 2026, Little Trainers Playgroup and Hazel Road Community Centre, 26 Hazel Road and Harriet Tubman House, 28 Hazel Road, London - Asked about the conditions
“The Chair queried whether, if the Committee were to seek additional commitments or conditions to improve these areas, potentially as mitigation for other impacts, this would influence their position.”
Minutes, 11 Feb 2026, Little Trainers Playgroup and Hazel Road Community Centre, 26 Hazel Road and Harriet Tubman House, 28 Hazel Road, London - Asked a question
“The Chair also asked what specific improvements they would seek.”
Minutes, 11 Feb 2026, Little Trainers Playgroup and Hazel Road Community Centre, 26 Hazel Road and Harriet Tubman House, 28 Hazel Road, London - Asked a question
“The Chair questioned whether opening up that rear area or creating additional passive surveillance might assist in addressing such issues.”
Minutes, 11 Feb 2026, Little Trainers Playgroup and Hazel Road Community Centre, 26 Hazel Road and Harriet Tubman House, 28 Hazel Road, London - Asked a question
“The Chair further queried whether improved public realm, rather than merely making good any damage, could be offered as a community benefit, and asked what specific commitments the applicant might be willing to consider.”
Minutes, 11 Feb 2026, Little Trainers Playgroup and Hazel Road Community Centre, 26 Hazel Road and Harriet Tubman House, 28 Hazel Road, London - Asked a question
“The Chair questioned how officers were ensuring that the proposed outdoor terrace would not adversely impact neighbouring properties.”
Minutes, 11 Feb 2026, Little Trainers Playgroup and Hazel Road Community Centre, 26 Hazel Road and Harriet Tubman House, 28 Hazel Road, London - Asked about heritage
“The Chair questioned how the heritage significance scoring undertaken by officers compared with the views held by local groups.”
Minutes, 11 Feb 2026, Little Trainers Playgroup and Hazel Road Community Centre, 26 Hazel Road and Harriet Tubman House, 28 Hazel Road, London - Asked about design and scale
“The Chair then queried what consideration had been given within the design to the turning area and the refuse store.”
Minutes, 11 Feb 2026, 7 Randall Avenue, London - Asked a question
“The Chair then sought clarification regarding the proposed driveway, which measured 2.9 metres in width.”
Minutes, 11 Feb 2026, 7 Randall Avenue, London - Raised concerns
“The Chair expressed concern that pedestrians would also be required to use this access route, including during hours of darkness, and queried whether the arrangement provided a safe means of access to the dwelling.”
Minutes, 11 Feb 2026, 7 Randall Avenue, London - Asked about parking
“The Chair questioned what assessment had been undertaken and whether restrictions on parking could be considered in order to reduce risk.”
Minutes, 11 Feb 2026, 7 Randall Avenue, London - Asked about design and scale
“The Chair asked officers to provide their assessment of the quality of the architectural design and its contribution to the local townscape throughout the planning process.”
Minutes, 12 Nov 2025, Argenta House, Argenta Way, London - Asked a question
“The Chair asked the objector which position he favoured.”
Minutes, 12 Nov 2025, 37 Lydford Road, London - Asked a question
“The Chair questioned how much flexibility members had when determining the application in view of the legal advice provided.”
Minutes, 12 Nov 2025, 37 Lydford Road, London - Asked a question
“The Chair asked if there was any detailed evidence to support the assertion that this scheme may assist in releasing family homes currently occupied by students.”
Minutes, 4 Aug 2025, Matalan Discount Club, Cricklewood Broadway, London - Asked a question
“The Chair sought clarification from the speaker on the principal concern regarding the proposed development.”
Minutes, 11 Jun 2025, 96, 96A-B, High Road, London
How this is worked out
Everything here is read from Brent’s published planning committee minutes, 7 meetings from June 2025 to August 2026. A councillor is matched across meetings by the council’s own member number where it has one, otherwise by full name.
Each vote shows how it is known. Named in the minutes: the minutes, or the council’s own recorded vote, list each member with their vote. From the count and the names: the minutes give the numbers and name the members in the minority, and every member present is known. All members present in favour: the minutes say every member voted for it and the members present are known. No vote against recorded: the minutes record the decision with no vote against, no abstention and no count, at a council whose minutes print a divided vote when there is one, so each member present is counted for. Unanimous vote: the minutes call the decision unanimous, or give a count with no one against and no one abstaining, and each member present is counted for. From the meeting recording: the vote was heard on the council’s recording of the meeting and closes exactly with the members present. Where none of these holds, the vote is left as “Not recorded” and is not counted.
Votes are on the resolution the committee passed, so a vote for is a vote with the majority. A vote is a decision on the application in front of the committee, not a statement of the councillor’s views. A percentage is shown only with five or more votes, decisions or meetings behind it.
Source: Plota analysis of the council’s minutes. The party is from the council’s own list of councillors.
Also on this committee
- Saqib ButtLabour
- Rita BegumLabour
- Robert JohnsonLabour
- Ajmal AkramLabour
- Jayanti PatelConservative
- Liz DixonLabour
- Elliot ChappellLabour
- Arshad MahmoodLabour
- Narinder Singh BajwaLabour