North Eastern Co-Operative 69 High Street Marske by the Sea Redcar TS11 6JL Data via plota.co.uk

R/2025/0813/CA - Conservation Area Approved

Proposal

Full planning permission for the installation of a pole mounted automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) camera Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
10 Dec 2025
✓
Approved
28 May 2026

Approved on 28 May 2026 · Committee · Last checked 3 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Redcar and Cleveland Regulatory Committee on 27 May 2026.

Approved

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because the camera was acceptable in scale and design, with no significant amenity or highway safety impacts.
  • Objectors raised concerns about community parking, displacement, local businesses, privacy, highway safety and the conservation area.
  • The committee approved the application, acknowledging parking concerns but finding limited planning grounds for refusal.
Read how the committee decided The proposed camera, the site and history, officers’ assessment, objections, committee debate, vote and decision.

Source: Plota analysis of Redcar and Cleveland's committee minutes of 27 May 2026.

Documents 72

Consultation & comments 58

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 27 Apr 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 26 Feb 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 30 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 30 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 30 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 30 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 30 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 29 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 29 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 29 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 29 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 29 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 29 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 29 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 29 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 29 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 29 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 29 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 29 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 29 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 29 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 28 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 22 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 21 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 20 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 20 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 19 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 16 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Consultee response - Parish/Town Council Document · 8 Jan 2026 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 22 Dec 2025 View ↗
PDF Consultee response - Strategic Planning (Conservation) Document · 18 Dec 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Document · 18 Dec 2025 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 6

4 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: 91a, High Street, Grade II, about 25 m from the postcode pin · 4 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 4 with distances
Historic England ↗
Nutrient neutrality catchment: Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA/Ramsar
New homes and overnight accommodation must show nutrient neutrality before approval.
Natural England advice: extra wastewater in these catchments harms protected habitats, so schemes must offset their nutrient load, usually through credits.
Marske-by-the-Sea conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Also on the record
National infrastructure project about 943 m away: East Coast Hydrogen Teesside Pipeline, at pre-application; Inside the Marske-by-the-Sea built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Building

Floor area1,525 m² (16,415 sq ft)
Energy ratingC (asset rating 54)
UseA1/A2 Retail and Financial/Professional services
HeatingHeating and Natural Ventilation

From the energy performance certificate lodged in April 2017, the latest held for this property, matched to this application by its address. The building may have changed since. View the certificate

Work with planning data?

Every application in Redcar and Cleveland - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Conservation Area
Postcode
TS11 6JL
Received
10 Dec 2025
Validated
10 Dec 2025
Parish
Saltburn, Marske and New Marske CP
Case officer
Show
Decision
GRANT PLANNING PERMISSION
Decision date
28 May 2026
Decision level
Committee
Applicant
Show
Agent
Stantec

How this decision compares

Decided in 169 days from validation, 113 days slower than Redcar and Cleveland's median of 56 for full applications. Approved, as 96% of full applications here are.

61%decided within 8 weeks
96%approved
10%go to committee

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Redcar and Cleveland in the last twelve months, from validation. Redcar and Cleveland decision record →

Public comments

56comments received

71 neighbours consulted · Last counted 3 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Consultation
11 Dec 2025
Comments by
30 Jan 2026
Committee
27 May 2026
Redcar and Cleveland
Planning Authority Score
6.8/10
Good
#69 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Redcar and Cleveland ranks #169 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Only 30% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Rarely extends deadlines
decisions usually arrive on time
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Redcar and Cleveland decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
96%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #15 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #58 of 296
62%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #169 of 296
30%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #56 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
18 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
9 decided (10+ homes)
95%
Change of use approved
37 decided
418
Total decisions
16 refused in the year to March 2026

Energy performance: Energy performance certificates from the Energy Performance of Buildings Register, Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright 2026.