Development At 11 To 12 And Findlay House 7, Manor Road, Woodford Green Data via plota.co.uk

2882/23/05 - Non-Material Amendment(s) Approved

Proposal

Non-material amendment to approved permission : addition of a louvre door to the east elevation, replacement of the second floor internal terrace with an office and store room and associated west elevation windows, reduction in the width of selected west elevation windows and minor internal layout and building services alterations. (Summary). Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
3 Jul 2026
✓
Validated
6 Jul 2026
✓
Approved
22 Jul 2026

Approved on 22 Jul 2026 · Delegated C/Signed G. Cooper · Last checked 22 Jul 2026

Associated applications 5

Site constraints 9

Archaeological priority area
An assessment or field evaluation may be asked for before ground works.
The council or Historic England considers archaeology likely here. A desk-based assessment, and sometimes trial trenching, can be asked for with the application.
Air quality management area: Redbridge AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Local nature reserve 141 m away: Claybury Park
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Also on the record
Conservation area 36 m away; Heritage at risk 36 m away: Woodford Bridge, Bridge; Inside the Redbridge built-up area; Public transport access: PTAL 1b (very poor), TfL 2023, for the 100 m square; Priority habitat 12 m away: No main habitat but additional habitats present; Green belt 46 m away: London.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No listed building at the site · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, Transport for London (public transport access levels, Powered by TfL Open Data, OGL v3.0, contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2025) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Redbridge - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Redbridge
Application type
Non-Material Amendment(s)
Received
3 Jul 2026
Validated
6 Jul 2026
Ward
Bridge
Case officer
Show
Target decision
30 Jul 2026
Decision
Granted/Approved/Agreed
Decision date
22 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated C/Signed G. Cooper
Applicant
Show
Agent
Turley

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-15055633
Site or press notice
6 Jul 2026
Redbridge
Planning Authority Score
4.5/10
Below average
#174 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Redbridge ranks #129 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Redbridge is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Redbridge decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
72%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #292 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #267 of 296
69%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #129 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #90 of 296
57%
Minor dwellings approved
152 decided (1-9 homes)
83%
Major dwellings approved
12 decided (10+ homes)
32%
Change of use approved
192 decided
1,673
Total decisions
461 refused in the year to March 2026