Land To The North Of 25 Nether Green Eastwood Nottinghamshire NG16 3DW Data via plota.co.uk

25/00540/FUL - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Construct detached dwelling Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
21 Jul 2025
✓
Validated
30 Jul 2025
✓
Consultation
1 Aug 2025
✓
Approved
14 Oct 2025

Approved on 14 Oct 2025 · Planning Committee · Last checked 14 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Broxtowe Planning Committee on 8 Oct 2025.

Approved

Against officer advice: officers had recommended refusal.

  • Officers advised refusal because the dwelling would harm Green Belt openness and would not be infill development.
  • A ward councillor opposed the application over road safety and Green Belt concerns; no neighbour comments were received.
  • The committee approved the application after considering the Green Belt and other development in the area.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officers’ assessment, consultation responses, committee debate, vote and conditions.

Source: Plota analysis of Broxtowe's committee minutes of 8 Oct 2025.

Associated applications 3

Site constraints 8

Green belt: Derby and Nottingham
Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.
Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.
Read the government guidance ↗
Coal mining development high risk area
Recorded coal mining features at or near the surface. Most planning applications here need a coal mining risk assessment.
From the Mining Remediation Authority, formerly the Coal Authority. The development high risk area marks recorded coal mining features at or near the surface: mine shafts and adits, shallow workings, mine gas and former opencast sites. Most planning applications there need a coal mining risk assessment; householder applications, changes of use and some minor works are exempt. Mine entry positions come from old plans and can be out by several metres, and unrecorded workings can exist anywhere in the coalfield.
Coal mining risk assessments ↗
In flood zones plus climate change
Inside the extent flood zones 2 and 3 could reach with climate change: the Central allowance for the 2080s on rivers, the Upper End allowance for sea level rise to 2125. From rivers. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Councils use it to decide when a flood risk assessment and the sequential test are needed. It is indicative and does not show whether a particular property will flood.
Flood map ↗
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Local nature reserve 480 m away: Brinsley Headstocks; 1 listed building within 150 m; Priority habitat 18 m away: Deciduous woodland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 15 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Broxtowe - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Broxtowe
Application type
Full Application
Postcode
NG16 3DW
Received
21 Jul 2025
Validated
30 Jul 2025
Ward
Eastwood Hall
Parish
Eastwood Town Council
Target decision
15 Oct 2025
Decision
Conditional Permission
Decision date
14 Oct 2025
Decision level
Planning Committee
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 76 days from validation, 23 days slower than Broxtowe's median of 53 for full applications. Approved, as 96% of full applications here are.

74%decided within 8 weeks
96%approved
100%go to committee

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Broxtowe in the last twelve months, from validation. Broxtowe decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

2 neighbours consulted · Last counted 14 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14191684
Planning Portal ref
PP-14191684
Neighbours
1 Aug 2025
Consultation
1 Aug 2025
Comments by
27 Aug 2025
Site or press notice
5 Aug 2025
Statutory expiry
24 Sept 2025
Env. assessment
No
Broxtowe
Planning Authority Score
8.4/10
Excellent
#16 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Broxtowe is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #48 out of 296. Only 29% of applications have the time limit extended, well below the 41% national average - the council usually decides on time. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (96%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Broxtowe decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
94%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #35 of 296
96%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #52 of 296
78%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #48 of 296
29%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #48 of 296
83%
Minor dwellings approved
42 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
7 decided (10+ homes)
92%
Change of use approved
36 decided
479
Total decisions
29 refused in the year to March 2026