Erection of 11 dwellings with associated parking at Heath Hill, Booth Road, Stacksteads, Bacup

Summary of planning committee decision

Deferred by Rossendale Development Control Committee on 6 Oct 2026.

2025/0318Deferred

No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.

The application was introduced

The Planning Officer introduced the application, including the proposal, site details, planning history, representations and consultation responses.

“The Planning Officer introduced the application as detailed in the report including the proposal, site details, relevant planning history, representations and consultation responses received. The Planning Officer also brought members attention to the Update Report.”

Minutes

Officers recommended approval

The officer recommendation was to approve the application subject to conditions and the reasons given for that recommendation.

“The Officer’s recommendation was to approve the application subject to the conditions detailed in the report and update report, for the reasons detailed in the report.”

Minutes

Speakers gave opposing views

One speaker spoke against the application and another spoke in favour; members asked questions for clarification.

Members discussed the proposal

Members discussed separation distances, the steep site, dwellings, viability, building height, landscaping, affordable housing, policy guidance and access.

“In determining the application, the Committee discussed the following: • Separation distances and the guidance provided • Steepness of the site • Number of dwellings proposed • Viability of proposal • Height of buildings • Landscape proposal • Affordable housing…”

“HS3 policy guidance • Access points of site…”

Minutes

The application was deferred

The committee voted to defer the application because of overdevelopment, inadequate separation distances and visual impact.

“A proposal was moved and seconded to defer the application. The reasons for deferral were: • Over development on site • Separation distances not adequate • Visual impact…”

“Resolved: That the application be deferred, for the following reasons: • Over development on site • Separation distances not adequate • Visual impact…”

Minutes

The members' reasons

The resolution gives these reasons:

  1. Over development on site • Separation distances not adequate • Visual impact 9.
Minutes

Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.

Councillors at the meeting

Apologies Marilyn Procter Labour, Julie Adshead Green

Also attending Alyson Barnes Labour

Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from Democracy Club.

Sources

  • Rossendale Development Control Committee minutes, 6 October 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Rossendale's committee minutes. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Rossendale
Date
Tuesday 6 October 2026
Committee decided
Deferred
Councillors
7Labour 3Conservative 1Green 12 otherShow councillors
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

48 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →