Erection of 11 dwellings with associated parking at Heath Hill, Booth Road, Stacksteads, Bacup
Summary of planning committee decision
Deferred by Rossendale Development Control Committee on 6 Oct 2026.
No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.
The application was introduced
The Planning Officer introduced the application, including the proposal, site details, planning history, representations and consultation responses.
“The Planning Officer introduced the application as detailed in the report including the proposal, site details, relevant planning history, representations and consultation responses received. The Planning Officer also brought members attention to the Update Report.”
Minutes
Officers recommended approval
The officer recommendation was to approve the application subject to conditions and the reasons given for that recommendation.
“The Officer’s recommendation was to approve the application subject to the conditions detailed in the report and update report, for the reasons detailed in the report.”
Minutes
Speakers gave opposing views
One speaker spoke against the application and another spoke in favour; members asked questions for clarification.
Members discussed the proposal
Members discussed separation distances, the steep site, dwellings, viability, building height, landscaping, affordable housing, policy guidance and access.
“In determining the application, the Committee discussed the following: • Separation distances and the guidance provided • Steepness of the site • Number of dwellings proposed • Viability of proposal • Height of buildings • Landscape proposal • Affordable housing…”
“HS3 policy guidance • Access points of site…”
Minutes
The application was deferred
The committee voted to defer the application because of overdevelopment, inadequate separation distances and visual impact.
“A proposal was moved and seconded to defer the application. The reasons for deferral were: • Over development on site • Separation distances not adequate • Visual impact…”
“Resolved: That the application be deferred, for the following reasons: • Over development on site • Separation distances not adequate • Visual impact…”
Minutes
The members' reasons
The resolution gives these reasons:
Minutes
- Over development on site • Separation distances not adequate • Visual impact 9.
Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.
Councillors at the meeting
- EatonChair
- Ashworth
- Matt NortonLabour
- Ann KenyonLabour
- Ann HodgkissConservative
- Bob BauldGreen
- Judith DriverLabour
Apologies Marilyn Procter Labour, Julie Adshead Green
Also attending Alyson Barnes Labour
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from Democracy Club.
Sources
- Rossendale Development Control Committee minutes, 6 October 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Rossendale's committee minutes. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Rossendale
- Date
- Tuesday 6 October 2026
- Committee decided
- Deferred
- Councillors
- 7Labour 3Conservative 1Green 12 otherShow councillors
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Rossendale committee decisions →
This committee's year
48 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.