Land East Of Marshfield And South Of A420 Marshfield South Gloucestershire Data via plota.co.uk

P25/02678/O - Outline Refused

Proposal

Erection of up to 50no. dwellings and associated works (Outline) with access to be determined, all other matters reserved. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
18 Nov 2025
✓
Validated
20 Nov 2025
✓
Consultation
2 Dec 2025
✗
Refused
3 Aug 2026
Appeal
Not lodged

Refused on 3 Aug 2026 · SPATIAL PLANNING COMMITTEE · Last checked 8 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by South Gloucestershire Spatial Planning Committee on 30 Jul 2026.

Refused by 5 votes to 0

No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.

  • The agent said the application was recommended for approval, with no outstanding statutory consultee objections.
  • Residents, the parish council, the community land trust and the primary school raised concerns about housing, accessibility and highway safety.
  • The committee voted 5:0:1 to refuse permission because of Green Belt, highway, sustainability, agricultural land and infrastructure concerns.
Read how the committee decided The proposed homes, site context, local views, committee debate, vote and reasons for refusal. Includes the meeting recording

Source: Plota analysis of South Gloucestershire's committee minutes of 30 Jul 2026.

Documents 106

Statements & assessments 46

PDF STATEMENT OF CASE Appellant`s Case · 29 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF SOC APPENDIX 8 - EDP8543_R007-D-ARBORICULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT_OPTIMIZED Appeal Correspondence · 29 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF TRANSPORT OFFICER Consultee Comment · 30 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF REVISED FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT Revised Document · 11 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF ECOLOGY Consultee Comment · 6 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF ECOLOGY Consultee Comment · 6 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF SGC DRAINAGE OFFICER Consultee Comment · 4 Mar 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY Supporting Document · 27 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY 1 Supporting Document · 27 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY 2 Supporting Document · 27 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY 3 Supporting Document · 27 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY 4 Supporting Document · 27 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY 5 Supporting Document · 27 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY 6 Supporting Document · 27 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY 7 Supporting Document · 27 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM Supporting Document · 27 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Revised Document · 27 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ECOLOGY Consultee Comment · 19 Dec 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Consultee Comment · 16 Dec 2025 View ↗
PDF SGC DRAINAGE OFFICER Consultee Comment · 11 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 1 OF 3-TRANSPORT STATEMENT Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 2 OF 3-TRANSPORT STATEMENT Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 3 OF 3-TRANSPORT STATEMENT Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 1 OF 5-DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 2 OF 5-DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 3 OF 5-DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 4 OF 5-DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 5 OF 5-DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 1 OF 8-FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 2 OF 8-FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 3 OF 8-FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 4 OF 8-FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 5 OF 8-FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 6 OF 8-FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 8 OF 8-FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 7 OF 8-FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF BIODIVERSITY METRIC CALCULATION TOOL Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF ARCHAEOLOGY AND HERITAGE ASSESSMENT Supporting Document · 18 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF ARBORICULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Supporting Document · 18 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF TRAVEL PLAN STATEMENT Supporting Document · 18 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF ENERGY & SUSTAINABILITY STATEMENT Supporting Document · 18 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF UTILITIES PLANNING STATEMENT Supporting Document · 18 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF UTILITY STATEMENT-APPENDICES Supporting Document · 18 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PLANNING STATEMENT Supporting Document · 18 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF ACOUSTIC ASSESSMENT REPORT Supporting Document · 18 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF ECOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Supporting Document · 18 Nov 2025 View ↗

Other documents 23

PDF INQUIRY ARRANGEMENTS CONFIRMED Appeal Correspondence · 7 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF APPEAL QUESTIONNAIRE Appeal Correspondence · 1 Oct 2026 View ↗ PDF SOC APPENDIX 3 - SITES_INSPECTION_REPORT-8746568 Appeal Correspondence · 29 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF SOC APPENDIX 4 - OFFICER_COMMITTEE_REPORT-8760138 Appeal Correspondence · 29 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF SOC APPENDIX 5 - CASE OFFICER EMAIL DATED 7 JULY 2026 Appeal Correspondence · 29 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF SOC APPENDIX 6 - N009 SITE INSPECTION 17.7.2026 ISSUE Appeal Correspondence · 29 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF SOC APPENDIX 7 -SPATIAL_PLANNING_SITES_INSPECTION_REPORT-8778700 Appeal Correspondence · 29 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF SOC APPENDIX 7 -SPATIAL_PLANNING_SITES_INSPECTION_REPORT-8778700 Appeal Correspondence · 29 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF SOC APPENDIX 9 ALC REPORT - MARSHFIELD - AUGUST 2026 Appeal Correspondence · 29 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF START LETTER Appeal Correspondence · 29 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF CASE CONFERENCE DETAILS Appeal Correspondence · 28 Sept 2026 View ↗ PDF OFFICER CIRCULATED/COMMITTEE Report · 22 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF SPATIAL PLANNING SITES INSPECTION REPORT Report · 7 Jul 2026 View ↗ PDF SITES INSPECTION REPORT Report · 2 Jun 2026 View ↗ PDF COVERING LETTER UPDATE Correspondence · 27 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF VERIFIED VIEWS LANDSCAPE DOCUMENT Supporting Document · 24 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 2-LANDSCAPE, VISUAL AMENITY AND GREEN BELT APPRAISAL Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 3-LANDSCAPE, VISUAL AMENITY AND GREEN BELT APPRAISAL Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 4-LANDSCAPE, VISUAL AMENITY AND GREEN BELT APPRAISAL Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 5-LANDSCAPE, VISUAL AMENITY AND GREEN BELT APPRAISAL Supporting Document · 20 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF PART 1-LANDSCAPE, VISUAL AMENITY AND GREEN BELT APPRAISAL Supporting Document · 18 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF LIGHTING STRATEGY REPORT Supporting Document · 18 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF COVERING LETTER Correspondence · 18 Nov 2025 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 6

Cotswolds National Landscape
Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
Marshfield Conservation Area conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
62 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin
Nearest: 68, High Street, Grade II, about 5 m from the postcode pin · 2 Grade II*, 60 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 62 with distances
Historic England ↗
Radon affected area, class 5
An estimated 10 to 30% of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Marshfield (South Gloucestershire) built-up area; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 3, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 17 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in South Gloucestershire - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Outline
Received
18 Nov 2025
Validated
20 Nov 2025
Ward
Boyd Valley
Parish
Marshfield Parish Council
Case officer
Show
Target decision
3 Aug 2026
Decision
Refusal
Decision date
3 Aug 2026
Decision level
SPATIAL PLANNING COMMITTEE
Applicant
Show
Agent
Armstrong Rigg Planning

How this decision compares

Decided in 256 days from validation, 195 days slower than South Gloucestershire's median of 61 for outline applications. Refused, as 23% of outline applications here are.

47%decided within 8 weeks
77%approved
7%go to committee

Plota live figures for outline applications decided by South Gloucestershire in the last twelve months, from validation. South Gloucestershire decision record →

Public comments

103comments received
100 objecting2 neutral1 supporting

97% object · above the UK average of 74%

160 neighbours consulted · Last counted 8 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14488269
Planning Portal ref
PP-14488269
Comments by
30 Apr 2026
Site or press notice
2 Dec 2025
Statutory expiry
3 Aug 2026
Env. assessment
No
South Gloucestershire
Planning Authority Score
2.8/10
Poor
#239 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

South Gloucestershire ranks #178 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. South Gloucestershire is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 83% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 83% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
South Gloucestershire decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
85%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #210 of 296
83%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #263 of 296
61%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #178 of 296
45%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #195 of 296
75%
Minor dwellings approved
220 decided (1-9 homes)
93%
Major dwellings approved
15 decided (10+ homes)
84%
Change of use approved
105 decided
1,585
Total decisions
245 refused in the year to March 2026