Indoor adventure park at Unit 1 Brooklands Way Boldon Colliery

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by South Tyneside Planning Committee on 22 Sept 2026.

260094Approved

What was proposed

The application sought to change a vacant storage and distribution unit into an indoor adventure park with trampolines, obstacle courses and parking.

“This application seeks full planning permission to change the use of the building from a B8 use to a Class E(d) use. The building would be used as an indoor adventure park, hosting various trampolines, obstacle courses and similar apparatus.”

“The existing delivery hardstand area would be converted to a car park to host 94 car parking spaces (including 3 disabled spaces) and 13 Sheffield Cycle Stands. The existing lorry storage hardstand area would be utilised as an area for deliveries, with a dedicated refuse bin storage area. The existing car park would remain as a car park reserved for staff, providing 22 car parking spaces (including 2 disabled spaces) and 10 secure cycle spaces.”

Officer report

The site

The unit is within Boldon Business Park, surrounded mainly by industrial, light industrial and storage businesses, with landscaping and car parking nearby.

“Description of the Site 1. This application relates to a vacant B8 (storage and distribution) unit within the Boldon Business Park. The unit lies immediately to the southeast of the Brooklands Way/Burford Way junction, with access from Burford Way. To the immediate north and east of the unit lies an area of landscaping and further to the east is Abingdon Way and the Boldon Colliery District Centre.”

“The building itself is constructed of metal cladding with loading bays to the eastern elevation facing onto a large hardstanding area. There is a separate car park to the northern portion of the hardstand adjacent to the building’s pedestrian entrance.”

Officer report

Earlier site history

Earlier permissions covered an industrial extension, hardstanding, fencing and additional roller doors at the site.

“ST/0027/18/FUL Extension to the South of the existing building, with associated enlargement of an external hard standing area and new palisade fencing. The use of the proposed extension would fall within Use Class B2 or B8 of the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 (as amended). Grant Permission with Conditions…”

“ST/0636/20/NMA Application for a non-material amendment to previously approved planning application ST/0027/18/FUL for an extension to the South of the existing building, with associated enlargement of an external hard standing area and new palisade fencing. Amendment now sought to include four new roller doors within western elevation. Approve Non- Material Change…”

Officer report

What people said

One objection raised noise pollution and concerns that children would wander around the streets.

“The application has been publicised by 7no. letters, a site notice and a press notice.”

“1no. representation has been received in objection to the proposal from an unknown address. The issues raised are summarised as follows: • Noise pollution • Concerns that children would wander around the streets.”

Officer report

What members discussed

Members asked about the limited number of firm offers and the employment effects of replacing warehouse use, and received explanations about modernisation, vacancies and new jobs.

“A Member queried why there had been a number of enquiries on the application site, but only one firm offer had been received. It was noted that while the specific reason wasn’t known, the building would have required modernising in order to be used for certain businesses. It was also noted that there were a number of other vacant sites and details on these were in the officer report.”

“A Member queried what the impact on potential jobs was from the site being taken out of employment use and the average number of employees in a warehouse such as this compared to what was being proposed. It was noted that a number couldn’t be advised as it would vary depending on employer etc, but that this application was to provide employment where none is currently provided due to the site being vacant.”

Minutes

The committee vote

The application was proposed and seconded for approval, then carried unanimously in favour.

“The application was proposed to be approved as per the officer recommendation by Cllr Mouat and seconded by Cllr Fascione.”

“The vote was carried unanimously in favour of the application.”

Minutes

The decision

Permission was granted with conditions controlling commencement, approved plans, the indoor leisure use and cycle and car parking.

“The Local Planning Authority would wish to carefully examine any alternative use of the building to assess whether the development would be acceptable in terms of , access and amenity, in accordance with South Tyneside Local Plan Policies 3, 27, 28 and 47. 4 Prior to the first occupation of the hereby approved development, 80no. cycle parking spaces, as identified on the Proposed Layout Plan - Drg No JEA-LAY- 005c received 03.09.2026 shall be provided on-site.”

“In order to provide a satisfactory standard of development in terms of parking provision in accordance with the South Tyneside Local Plan Policy 47. 5 Prior to the first occupation of the hereby approved development, the proposed car parking areas, as identified on the Proposed Layout Plan - Drg No JEA-LAY- 005c received 03.09.2026 must be marked out and completed on-site.”

Minutes

Councillors at the meeting

The minutes record this decision with no vote against, so each member present for this item is shown as voting for it.

Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from Democracy Club.

Sources

  • South Tyneside Planning Committee minutes, 22 September 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of South Tyneside's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Date
Tuesday 22 September 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Councillors
11Reform UK 6Green 32 otherShow votes
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

23 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →