Land At Cobbolds Farm Ipswich Road Hadleigh Ipswich Suffolk IP7 6BG Data via plota.co.uk

DC/25/05471 - Reserved Matters Approved

Proposal

Application for approval of Reserved Matters pursuant to Outline Planning Permission (allowed under appeal decision APP/) - Appearance, Landscaping, Layout and Scale for Employment land for use as Class E Business buildings up to 1900m2 and Classes B2 and B8 buildings up to 4200m2 Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
15 Dec 2025
✓
Validated
23 Dec 2025
✓
Consultation
14 Jan 2026
✓
Approved
16 Apr 2026

Approved on 16 Apr 2026 · Babergh Planning Committee · Last checked 2 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Babergh Mid Suffolk Babergh Planning Committee on 15 Apr 2026.

Approved unanimously

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approving the reserved matters because the design, landscaping and layout addressed the site’s constraints and proposed impacts.
  • Parish councils raised concerns about traffic and lighting, while highways and other consultees raised no objection subject to conditions.
  • The committee unanimously approved the application, adding controls on lighting, signage and reference to Dark Skies guidance.
Read how the committee decided The proposed development, site history, officers’ assessment, consultation responses, debate, conditions and committee decision.

Source: Plota analysis of Babergh Mid Suffolk's committee minutes of 15 Apr 2026.

Documents 26

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 5

Agricultural land, grade 3a
Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
National infrastructure project 313 m away: Bramford to Twinstead
The site is 313 m from the project boundary. Electricity line, decided. The project page says whether consent was granted.
Nationally significant infrastructure projects (power stations, electricity lines, pipelines, major roads and railways, harbours, airports and reservoirs) are consented by a Secretary of State under the Planning Act 2008, after an examination by the Planning Inspectorate, rather than by the council. The boundary is the one the Inspectorate consults on and can change as the scheme does. Projects are shown within 2 km of the site.
Planning Inspectorate project page ↗
Public bridleway 24 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
SSSI 239 m away: Hintlesham Woods SSSI.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 2 November 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Babergh Mid Suffolk - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Reserved Matters
Postcode
IP7 6BG
Received
15 Dec 2025
Validated
23 Dec 2025
Ward
Hadleigh South
Parish
Hadleigh
Case officer
Show
Target decision
17 Apr 2026
Decision
Granted
Decision date
16 Apr 2026
Decision level
Babergh Planning Committee
Applicant
Show
Agent
Artisan PPS Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 114 days from validation, 56 days slower than Babergh Mid Suffolk's median of 58 for reserved matters. Approved, as 100% of reserved matters here are.

44%decided within 8 weeks
100%approved
19%go to committee

Plota live figures for reserved matters decided by Babergh Mid Suffolk in the last twelve months, from validation. Babergh Mid Suffolk decision record →

Public comments

No public comments yet.

27 neighbours consulted · Last counted 2 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Neighbours
14 Jan 2026
Consultation
14 Jan 2026
Comments by
10 Feb 2026
Site or press notice
19 Jan 2026
Committee
15 Apr 2026
Statutory expiry
24 Mar 2026
Env. assessment
No
Babergh Mid Suffolk
Planning Authority Score
7.7/10
Good
#33 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Babergh Mid Suffolk is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #56 out of 296. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Faster than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Babergh Mid Suffolk decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
89%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #124 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #68 of 296
77%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #56 of 296
34%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #83 of 296
74%
Minor dwellings approved
160 decided (1-9 homes)
73%
Major dwellings approved
11 decided (10+ homes)
93%
Change of use approved
40 decided
882
Total decisions
99 refused in the year to March 2026