Bow Meadows Farm,Sunderland Road,East Boldon,NE36 0BX Data via plota.co.uk

260297 - Discharge of Conditions REGISTERED

Proposal

Discharge of Conditions 3 (asbestos Survey), 5 (Site Investigation and Risk Assessment/Phase 2), 6 (Contaminated Land remediation Strategy), 7 (Verification strategy), and 12 (Demolition and Construction Method Statement) in relation to previously approved Planning Application . Data via plota.co.uk

Track application Save this application and get an email when its status or decision changes. Alerts nearby Get email alerts for new planning applications near this address.

View original council record ↗Last checked 27 Oct 2026, 07:19

Application progress

✓

Received

12 May 2026

Decision

Target date was 7 Jul 2026

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 7 Jul 2026.

The consultation period closed on 26 Oct 2026.

Documents

View the documents on the council's website ↗

Associated applications 2

Part of

Full6 Feb 2023council archive

Conditions details submitted for 3, 5, 6, 7, 12
- ConditionsDischarge of Conditions 3 (asbestos Survey), 5 (Site Investigation and Risk Assessment/Phase…This application12 May 2026260297

Site constraints 5

Green belt: Tyne and Wear

Inappropriate development needs very special circumstances.

Green belt policy allows a short list of exceptions, such as limited extensions and replacement buildings. Anything else needs very special circumstances that clearly outweigh the harm. Some green belt land can count as grey belt, where it does not strongly serve the green belt's purposes. The council decides this in its green belt assessment or on each application, so we do not mark it here.

Read the government guidance ↗

Agricultural land, grade 2

Best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 3. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.

Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.

Habitat network: Network Expansion Zone

Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.

Also on the record

Radon affected area, class 2; Coalfield, development low risk area.

Not affected

Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in South Tyneside - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council: South Tyneside
Application type: Discharge of Conditions
Postcode: NE36 0BX
Received: 12 May 2026
Validated: 12 May 2026
Ward: Cleadon Village and East Boldon
Case officer: Show
Applicant: Show
Agent: Mario Minchella Architects

Consultation & key dates

Comments by: 26 Oct 2026
Statutory expiry: 7 Jul 2026

South Tyneside

Planning Authority Score

5.9/10

Average

#108 of 296 councils

Relevant to this application:

Householder decisions

South Tyneside ranks #154 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 98% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils

98% approved vs 90% nationally

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance

South Tyneside decision statistics

Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026

92%

Overall approval rate

Above avg (87%) #92 of 296

98%

Householder approved

Above avg (90%) #24 of 296

64%

Decided in 8 weeks

Above avg (63%) #154 of 296

44%

Extended time limit

Above avg (41%) #186 of 296

88%

Minor dwellings approved

8 decided (1-9 homes)

75%

Major dwellings approved

4 decided (10+ homes)

58%

Change of use approved

48 decided

396

Total decisions

32 refused in the year to March 2026