32 Wilford Lane West Bridgford Nottinghamshire Data via plota.co.uk

26/01340/TPO - Tree Preservation Order Pending Decision

Proposal

T1 (Holly) - Mature. Crown lift to clear roof of bin store. T2 (Lime) - Remove deadwood >50mm in diameter and >1m in length. Remove epicormic growth and crown lift to leave clear stem to 5m. T4 (Lime) - Mature. Remove epicormic growth and crown lift to leave clear stem to 5m. T6 (Lime) - Fungal brackets at 8m on old wounds. Remove epicormic growth and crown lift to leave clear stem to 4m. Reinspect in 18 months. T8 (Lime) - Remove deadwood >50mm in diameter and >1m in length, remove epicormic growth and crown lift to leave clear stem to 5m. T10 (Lime) - Remove epicormic growth and crown lift to leave clear stem to 5m. T11 (Lime) - Remove deadwood >50mm in diameter and >1m in length. Remove epicormic growth and crown lift to leave clear stem to 5m. Target prune to clear under lamp. T3 (Lime), T5 (Lime), T7 (Lime) - Remove epicormic growth and crown lift to leave clear stem to 4m. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗

Application progress

Received
6 Aug 2026
Consultation
10 Aug 2026
Decision
Awaiting decision

This application is under consideration - no decision has been issued yet. Comments are open until 1 Sept 2026.

Comment on this application ↗

Work with planning data? Every application in Rushcliffe - and every UK council - as a live feed or API. About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rushcliffe
Application type
Tree Preservation Order
Postcode
NG2 7TU
Received
6 Aug 2026
Validated
6 Aug 2026
Ward
Compton Acres
Case officer
Show
Target decision
1 Oct 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show

Public comments

No public comments yet.

107 neighbours consulted · Last counted 17 Aug 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Neighbours
11 Aug 2026
Consultation
10 Aug 2026
Comments by
1 Sept 2026
Env. assessment
No
Rushcliffe
Planning Authority Score
3.8/10
Below average
#208 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rushcliffe is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #233 out of 296. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rushcliffe decision performance
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #91 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #89 of 296
51%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #233 of 296
50%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #227 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
74 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
100%
Change of use approved
13 decided
761
Total decisions
60 refused in the year to March 2026