River View Court 12 - 20 Wilford Lane West Bridgford Nottinghamshire Data via plota.co.uk

26/00793/TPO - Tree Preservation Order Approved

Proposal

Trees T1 (Cedar) Reduce in the limbs toward neighbouring building giving 3m clearance. All reductions to be taken back to suitable growth points. T2 (Lime) Regularly maintain basal and epicormic growth correctly and pruning. Reduce top by up to 3 metres in height to alleviate weight on pollard points. Remove epicormic growth on the stem. T3 (Lime) Regularly maintain basal and epicormic growth correctly and pruning. Reduce top by up to 3 metres in height to alleviate weight on pollard points. Remove epicormic growth on the stem. T4 (Sycamore) Remove all deadwood, reduce 2-3 metres off the lateral branches and rounding into the top. Clear light column giving good visibility splay i.e. secondary branch east side of column to be removed. All reductions to be taken back to suitable growth points. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
7 May 2026
✓
Consultation
1 Jul 2026
✓
Approved
1 Jul 2026

Approved on 1 Jul 2026 · Delegated Decision · Last checked 5 Jul 2026

Site constraints 8

Flood zone 3, rivers and sea
High chance: a 1 in 100 or greater annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Public footpath about 27 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Also on the record
Registered park or garden about 169 m away: Memorial Gardens, Nottingham; Coalfield, development low risk area; Flood defence about 29 m from the postcode pin (wall, designed for a 1 in 100 year flood); 2 listed buildings within 150 m of the postcode pin; Inside the West Bridgford built-up area; Air quality management area about 19 m away: AQMA No.1.
Not affected
Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 6 October 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rushcliffe - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rushcliffe
Application type
Tree Preservation Order
Postcode
NG2 7QX
Received
7 May 2026
Validated
7 May 2026
Ward
Compton Acres
Case officer
Show
Target decision
2 Jul 2026
Decision
Grant consent subject to conditions
Decision date
1 Jul 2026
Decision level
Delegated Decision
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 55 days from validation, 10 days slower than Rushcliffe's median of 45 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 95% of tree and landscaping works here are.

84%decided within 8 weeks
95%approved
38decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Rushcliffe in the last twelve months, from validation. Rushcliffe decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Neighbours
8 May 2026
Consultation
1 Jul 2026
Comments by
22 Jul 2026
Statutory expiry
2 Jul 2026
Env. assessment
No
Rushcliffe
Planning Authority Score
3.8/10
Below average
#208 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rushcliffe is slower than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #233 out of 296. 50% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

Slower than most councils
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rushcliffe decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #91 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #89 of 296
51%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #233 of 296
50%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #227 of 296
78%
Minor dwellings approved
74 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
20 decided (10+ homes)
100%
Change of use approved
13 decided
761
Total decisions
60 refused in the year to March 2026