111 homes at Fleming Way, Isleworth

Summary of planning committee decision

Decided by Hounslow Planning Committee on 3 Sept 2026.

P/2026/0384Approved

What was proposed

The application proposed replacing two commercial unit groups with two residential blocks containing up to 111 homes, infrastructure and landscaping.

“P/2026/0384 Address: Units 1-4 and 7-8, Victory Business Centre, Fleming Way, TW7 6DB (Hounslow South) Proposal: The demolition and redevelopment of Units 1-4 for a six- storey, residential apartment building (Use Class C3) consisting of up to 90 dwellings; and demolition and redevelopment of Units 7&8 for a part four-storey/ part five-storey building (Use Class C3) consisting of up to 21 dwellings; with associated infrastructure and landscaping.”

“SUMMARY 1.1 This application proposes the redevelopment of the site through the demolition of existing commercial units and the erection of two residential blocks, ranging from three to six storeys, comprising a total of 111 dwellings. The proposal would provide a good standard of accommodation for future residents and would enhance the appearance of the site.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The site contained partly occupied commercial buildings within a wider business centre, near residential properties, industrial premises and existing redevelopment phases.

“SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 The application site comprises the site of Units 1-4 and Units 7-8 Victory Business Centre and represents the third phase of redevelopment within the Victory Business Centre. Units 1-4 are located to directly to the south of the site entrance from Fleming Way comprised of 1,068 square metres of floorspace, partially occupied by office and Sui Generis uses.”

“The wider Victory Business Centre (not including the developed Units 9-10) currently comprises a total of 2,931 square metres of floorspace, of which 1,579 is currently vacant; equating to a current vacancy rate of 53%. Within the occupied floorspace there are now industrial uses, with 67% (900sqm) is in use as office space, with 33% (450sqm) being Sui Generis.”

Officer report

Earlier applications

Earlier permissions allowed residential redevelopment of other parts of the business centre, while prior approval applications for these units had not all succeeded.

“Constraints: • Locally Significant Industrial Site • Air Quality Management Area • Flood Zone 1 3.0 PLANNING HISTORY 3.1 The following planning history is relevant to the application site and wider Victory Business Centre.”

“P/2024/2259 Erection of a six storey residential block to create 71 self contained flats with associated landscaping, private amenity space, roof terrace, car parking, cycle and refuse storage. Following the demolition of the existing Units 5 & 6. Resolution to Grant at Planning Committee: 13/02/2025 PA/2025/0414 Prior approval for the demolition of the two office units.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the proposal would make efficient use of an underused site, provide acceptable homes and design, and deliver substantial sustainability benefits.

“The proposal would redevelop a previously developed and substantially underutilised site, making efficient use of the land, bringing vacant/underutilised floorspace, and optimising the residential capacity of the subject site. A resolution for the Approval of the planning application is therefore recommended, subject to the completion of a S106 agreement and recommended conditions.”

Officer report

Residents’ objections

Residents objected to the development’s scale, industrial land use, effects on neighbouring homes, parking, traffic, infrastructure, construction disturbance and odour.

“The proposed density is disproportionate to the character of the area. See paragraphs 8.5 and 8.6 on making the ‘efficient use of land’ and paragraphs 8.154 - 8.196 on the assessment of design, including density in relation to the surrounding area. Cumulative harm to local infrastructure and utilities, public services (including health), and amenities through the increase in residents. See paragraphs 8.96 – 8.100 relating to the impact on community infrastructure.”

“See paragraphs 8.329 – 8.333 for the noise assessment and disturbances during construction. Increased congestion of the local road network and harm/damage to the road infrastructure. See paragraphs 8.342 – 8.377 for the full transport assessment. Reduced road safety for Emergency Vehicles. The proposal would not cause harm to the wider road network and would not restrict access for Emergency Vehicles to the site.”

Officer report

What members discussed

Members debated harm to Meadowbrook Court, amenity space, parking, play funding, affordable housing, industrial demand and the site’s viability and history.

“Redlees Park had been selected as the recipient of the £4,000 funding for play facilities as it was closest. A member advised that the Unwin Road playground was closer and needed the investment more, as Redlees Park had been recently renovated. [name withheld] advised that the funding could be reviewed if necessary. An earlier application was confirmed as having been viability tested and given a 0% affordable housing requirement.”

“Cllr Craig Owen agreed with earlier points and acknowledged the positives of the proposal, ie a lot of new homes on underutilised land, but expressed concerns about the harm to Meadowbrook Court as well as insufficient amenities and parking stress. He could not see why the neighbouring site was 100% affordable housing (AH) and this was not.”

Minutes

The vote and decision

Members approved the officer recommendation by ten votes to one, with two abstentions, subject to a legal agreement and recommended conditions.

“Cllr Bowring moved approval of the officer’s recommendations, pending negotiation of funding for amenities as suggested by Cllr Louki and also the possibility of investing in the children’s play areas in Unwin Road rather than Redlees Park. Cllr Adesh Farmahan second the motion. Members voted by a majority to approve the recommendations.”

“Resolved – that planning application P/2026/0384, the demolition and redevelopment of Units 1-4 for a six-storey, residential apartment building (Use Class C3) consisting of up to 90 dwellings; and demolition and redevelopment of Units 7&8 for a part four-storey/ part five- storey building (Use Class C3) consisting of up to 21 dwellings; with associated infrastructure and landscaping, was approved subject to the completion of a S106 agreement and recommended conditions.”

Minutes

Councillors at the meeting

Apologies Michael Denniss Conservative

Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.

Sources

  • Hounslow Planning Committee minutes, 3 September 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Hounslow's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Hounslow
Date
Thursday 3 September 2026
Recommendation
Officers recommended approval
Committee decided
Approved
Councillors
14Labour 6Conservative 3Lab Co-op 2Reform UK 2Green 1Show councillors
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

26 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 1 against officer advice.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →