Former Parrock Mill Site Todmorden Road Bacup Lancashire Data via plota.co.uk

2025/0288 - Full Application Approved

Proposal

Full: Gravel hardstanding and infrastructure for the location of three mobile Camping Pods and one Toilet/shower Pod plus space for access and parking (part-retrospective) Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
23 Jul 2025
✓
Validated
21 Aug 2025
✓
Consultation
21 Aug 2025
✓
Approved
10 Dec 2025

Approved on 10 Dec 2025 · Committee Decision · Last checked 16 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Rossendale Development Control Committee on 8 Dec 2025.

Approved

No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.

  • A supporter spoke in favour of the application.
  • Members noted that access to the site is tight so patrons could be reminded, and welcomed the application for supporting tourism in the area.
  • The committee voted unanimously, 7 for and none against, to approve the application subject to conditions.

Source: Plota analysis of Rossendale's committee minutes, Rossendale Development Control Committee minutes, 8 December 2025 .

Documents 39

Consultation & comments 18

PDF UNITED UTILITIES - FURTHER COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 13 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF EA - RE-CONSULTATION COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 12 Nov 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Support Comment · 13 Oct 2025 View ↗
PDF UNITED UTILITIES - COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 29 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 25 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 24 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Support Comment · 17 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION - COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 10 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF ENVIRONMENT AGENCY - COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 9 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 5 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 5 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF LCC HIGHWAYS - COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 4 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Support Comment · 2 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Support Comment · 1 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF Supporter’s name hidden Show Support Comment · 1 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 27 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 26 Aug 2025 View ↗
PDF COAL AUTHORITY - COMMENTS REDACTED Consultee Comment · 22 Aug 2025 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 2

Site constraints 8

Coal mining development high risk area
Recorded coal mining features at or near the surface. Most planning applications here need a coal mining risk assessment. Nearest recorded mine shaft: 15 m away (reference 388424-010). 5 recorded mine entries within 50 m.
From the Mining Remediation Authority, formerly the Coal Authority. The development high risk area marks recorded coal mining features at or near the surface: mine shafts and adits, shallow workings, mine gas and former opencast sites. Most planning applications there need a coal mining risk assessment; householder applications, changes of use and some minor works are exempt. Mine entry positions come from old plans and can be out by several metres, and unrecorded workings can exist anywhere in the coalfield.
Coal mining risk assessments ↗
Article 4 direction
Immediate Article 4 Direction for small Houses in Multiple Occupation. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Agricultural land, grade 4
Poor quality farmland, not best and most versatile. Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Public footpath 20 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; National infrastructure project: Calderdale Energy Park, at pre-application; Flood defence 40 m away (natural high ground, designed for a 1 in 5 year flood).
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 16 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rossendale - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rossendale
Application type
Full Application
Postcode
OL13 9FR
Received
23 Jul 2025
Validated
21 Aug 2025
Ward
Bacup
Case officer
Show
Target decision
12 Dec 2025
Decision
Approve with Conditions
Decision date
10 Dec 2025
Decision level
Committee Decision
Applicant
Show
Agent
Peel Design Partnership Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 111 days from validation, 27 days slower than Rossendale's median of 84 for full applications. Approved, as 87% of full applications here are.

23%decided within 8 weeks
87%approved
17%go to committee

Plota live figures for full applications decided by Rossendale in the last twelve months, from validation. Rossendale decision record →

Public comments

20comments received
5 objecting15 supporting

75% support · above the UK average of 16%

9 neighbours consulted · Last counted 16 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14184337
Planning Portal ref
PP-14184337
Neighbours
21 Aug 2025
Consultation
21 Aug 2025
Comments by
26 Sept 2025
Site or press notice
4 Sept 2025
Committee
8 Dec 2025
Statutory expiry
16 Oct 2025
Env. assessment
No
Rossendale
Planning Authority Score
1/10
Poor
#293 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Rossendale is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #287 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 75% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (88%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rossendale decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
86%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #197 of 296
88%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #222 of 296
27%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #287 of 296
75%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #293 of 296
85%
Minor dwellings approved
34 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
3 decided (10+ homes)
59%
Change of use approved
17 decided
231
Total decisions
33 refused in the year to March 2026