Whitworth Park Phase 6 Spennymoor DL16 7RQ Data via plota.co.uk

DM/25/01790/FPA - Full Planning Application Approved

Proposal

Construction of 299 dwellings with access from Allerton Way and associated parking, roads, infrastructure, landscaping and SuDS. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
3 Jul 2025
✓
Validated
16 Jul 2025
✓
Consultation
30 Sept 2025
✓
Approved
5 Nov 2025

Approved on 5 Nov 2025 · County Planning Committee · Last checked 14 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by Durham County Planning Committee on 5 Nov 2025.

Approved

As officers recommended.

  • Officers advised approval because housing benefits and mitigation outweighed sustainability and agricultural-land harm.
  • The committee approved the application subject to conditions and a Section 106 agreement.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, site history, officers’ assessment, objections, speakers, debate, vote and decision. Includes the meeting recording

Source: Plota analysis of Durham's committee minutes of 5 Nov 2025.

Documents 54

Statements & assessments 21

PDF AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT REV C Amended Report · 1 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF BNG REPORT V1 Amended Report · 8 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF BNG METRIC V6 Supporting Information · 8 Sept 2025 View ↗ PDF BNG METRIC Superseded · 11 Aug 2025 View ↗ PDF BNG METRIC 3.1 V5 Superseded · 16 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT ADDENDUM Supporting Information · 3 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF PLANNING STATEMENT Supporting Information · 3 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT Supporting Information · 3 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT FINAL Supporting Information · 3 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF SUSTAINABILITY APPRAISAL Supporting Information · 3 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Supporting Information · 3 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 3 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT Superseded · 3 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF FLOOR RISK ASSESSMENT & DRAINAGE STRATEGY Supporting Information · 3 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF BAT SURVEY REPORT Supporting Information · 3 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF ECOLOGICAL APPRAISAL Supporting Information · 3 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF PRELIMINARY ECOLOGICAL APPRAISAL Supporting Information · 3 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF BREEDING BIRD SURVEY REPORT Supporting Information · 3 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF SUSTAINABILITY STATEMENT Supporting Information · 3 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 3 Jul 2025 View ↗ PDF ODOUR ASSESSMENT Supporting Information · 3 Jul 2025 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Associated applications 8

Site constraints 4

Agricultural land, grade 3b, surveyed
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: Natural England's post-1988 ALC field survey (Leeds). Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) agrees.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Survey report ↗
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 2; Coalfield, development low risk area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 14 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Durham - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Durham
Application type
Full Planning Application
Postcode
DL16 7RQ
Received
3 Jul 2025
Validated
16 Jul 2025
Ward
Spennymoor
Parish
Spennymoor
Case officer
Show
Target decision
11 Feb 2026
Decision
S106+Approved BNG Required
Decision date
5 Nov 2025
Decision level
County Planning Committee
Applicant
Show

How this decision compares

Decided in 112 days from validation, 51 days slower than Durham's median of 61 for new homes. Approved, as 69% of new homes here are.

43%decided within 8 weeks
69%approved
17%go to committee

Plota live figures for new homes decided by Durham in the last twelve months, from validation. Durham decision record →

Public comments

47comments received
47 objecting

100% object · above the UK average of 74%

346 neighbours consulted · Last counted 14 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Alt. reference
PP-14139346
Planning Portal ref
PP-14139346
Neighbours
29 Oct 2025
Consultation
30 Sept 2025
Comments by
21 Oct 2025
Site or press notice
22 Jul 2025
Statutory expiry
15 Oct 2025
Env. assessment
No
Durham
Planning Authority Score
5.2/10
Average
#137 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Durham ranks #190 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. 48% of applications have the time limit extended, above the 41% national average. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 97% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
97% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Durham decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
93%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #52 of 296
97%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #29 of 296
59%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #190 of 296
48%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #213 of 296
79%
Minor dwellings approved
95 decided (1-9 homes)
90%
Major dwellings approved
49 decided (10+ homes)
87%
Change of use approved
201 decided
1,706
Total decisions
113 refused in the year to March 2026