Rear extension and raised patio at 16 Corringham Road, London NW11
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Barnet Planning Committee on 14 Oct 2026.
What was proposed
The application proposed a rear extension, alterations to the side roof, a raised patio with planters and steps, and taller privacy screens.
“Single storey rear extension with pitched roof and 6no. rooflights following demolition of existing single storey rear projection. Removal of existing side pitched roof and replacement with raised flat roof. New rear raised patio with planters and access steps to lower lawn. Increase to height of privacy screens on both boundaries.”
“Part of the existing side extension would be altered by replacing a section of existing pitched roof with a flat roof, matching the 4.00 metre height of the rear extension.”
Officer report
The site
The site is a two-storey semi-detached home in a mainly residential area, outside a conservation area and without protected trees.
“The application site comprises a two-storey semi-detached dwelling within the ward of Childs Hill. The surrounding area is predominantly residential, characterised by properties of similar architectural design. The site does not contain any protected trees, nor are there protected trees on adjacent land. The site is not situated in a conservation area, nor is it a listed building.”
Officer report
Earlier applications
Earlier decisions included an approved front and side extension, a lawful rear patio alteration, an unlawful side extension, and an approved side extension.
“Reference: C10810 Address: 16 Corringham Road, London, NW11 7BT Decision: Approved Subject to Conditions Decision Date: 19.02.1991 Description: Front and side extension and alterations to vehicular access.”
“Reference: F/03715/13 Address: 16 Corringham Road, London, NW11 7BT Decision: Lawful Decision Date: 14.10.2013 Description: Installation of new French door to rear bay window, and raise level of existing rear patio by 0.3 m approx.”
Officer report
The main planning issues
The main issues were the effect on the building and local character and the living conditions of neighbouring residents.
“The main issues for consideration in this case are:”
“- Whether harm would be caused to the character and appearance of the existing building, the street scene and the wider locality; - Whether harm would be caused to the living conditions of neighbouring residents.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
Trees and landscaping officers raised no objection, recommended boundary planting and advised conditions.
“Following a site visit, Trees and Landscaping Officers were consulted. Comments are summarised as follows: - No objection. The proposal affects one dead tree and shrubs only. No significant tree constraints. - Additional tree planting along the boundary is recommended to soften the impact of the extension and improve amenity. - Conditions recommended.”
Officer report
Members’ questions
The committee had the opportunity to ask questions of the speakers and officers.
“The Planning Officer presented the report.”
“The Committee then had the opportunity to ask questions of the speakers and officers.”
Minutes
The decision
The application was approved subject to conditions, with delegated authority for minor changes to the recommended conditions or reasons.
“RESOLVED the application be APPROVED subject to conditions AND the Committee grants delegated authority to the Service Director – Planning and Building Control to make any minor alterations, additions or deletions to the recommended conditions/obligations or reasons for refusal as set out in this report and addendum provided this authority shall be exercised after consultation with the Chair (or in their absence the Vice-Chair) of the Committee (who may request that such…”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Richard BarnesChairLabour
- Philip CohenVice-ChairLabour
- Carrie ReinersLabour
- Shimon RydeConservative
- Shuey GordonConservative
- Jeremy ConwayConservative
- Lachhya Bahadur GurungSubstitute for Josh Mastin-LeeConservative
- Humayune KhalickSubstitute for Rishikesh ChakrabortyLabour
Apologies Rishikesh Chakraborty Labour, Josh Mastin-Lee Conservative
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Barnet Planning Committee minutes, 14 October 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Barnet's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Barnet Planning Committee
- Council
- Barnet
- Date
- Wednesday 14 October 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Councillors
- 8Conservative 4Labour 4Show councillors
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Barnet committee decisions →
This committee's year
41 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 3 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.