Vehicular and pedestrian access at Land East of Eashing Lane and West of Ock Way, Godalming
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Waverley Planning Committee on 8 Jul 2026.
What was proposed
The application sought a vehicular access to Ock Way and three pedestrian access routes.
“‒ Creation of a vehicular access to Ock Way. ‒ Creation of three pedestrian access routes.”
Officer report
Consultation responses
The highway authority raised no objection subject to conditions, while the town council sought cross-boundary contributions and safer links.
“Consultees Comments SCC Highway Authority No objection (subject to conditions) (19/05/2026) SCC Lead Local Flood Authority As the Surface Water drainage is part of the overall wider development (planning ref: 25/P/01474 Guildford Borough Council) and there is no change or update to the surface water drainage strategy for these works, we would have no further comments. (19/03/2026) Guildford Borough Council No observations.”
“‒ As part of the officer recommendation on the Guildford application, the heads of terms for the wider residential development at Eashing Lane / Ock Way (25/P/01474) included, amongst other matters, healthcare contributions, police contributions, early years education contributions as well as a package of highways improvements.”
Officer report
Who spoke
Two people spoke against the application, one spoke in support and one represented Godalming Town Council.
The committee vote
The committee voted against the officers’ recommendation, then supported an alternative proposal to refuse permission by seven votes to two.
“Following debate, the committee voted against the officers recommendation to grant permission 2 in favour, no abstentions and 7 against.”
“The committee voted on the revised proposal 7 in favour, no abstentions and 2 against RESOLVED that planning permission be REFUSED for the following reasons:”
Minutes
The decision
Permission was refused because the access would generate significant additional traffic through Ockford Park and harm residential amenities.
“RESOLVED that planning permission be REFUSED for the following reasons:”
“The creation of the proposed access would generate a significant level of additional traffic through the existing residential estate of Ockford Park which would be harmful to the amenities of residents within the development and the surrounding residential area. As such the proposed development would be contrary to Local Plan Policy DM5.”
Minutes
The members' reasons
The resolution gives these reasons:
Minutes
- 24.1 TPO 09/26 - TREES ON LAND SOUTH OF MANFIELD PARK, CRANLEIGH, GU6 8PT (Agenda item 9.1) To consider the objection to the making of a Tree Preservation Order (TPO) 09/26 and to determine whether the Order should be confirmed, with or without modification. There are environmental benefits in retaining trees which merit special protection. Following debate, the committee voted unanimously in favo
Source: the council's minutes, quoted word for word.
Councillors at the meeting
- Penny RiversChairLib Dem
- Terry WeldonVice-ChairLib Dem
- Peter ClarkIndependent
- Carole CockburnConservative
- Maxine GaleIndependent
- Andrew LaughtonResidents
- Andy MacLeodResidents
- Julian SpenceLib Dem
- BeamSubstitute
Proposed by Councillor Julian Spence, seconded by Councillor Peter Clark.
Apologies Daniel Husseini Conservative, Jacquie Keen Lib Dem, David Munro Independent, Richard Steijger Lib Dem, Phoebe Sullivan Conservative, Graham White Residents
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Waverley Planning Committee minutes, 8 July 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Waverley's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Committee
- Waverley Planning Committee
- Council
- Waverley
- Date
- Wednesday 8 July 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Refused, against officer advice
- Vote
- Unanimous
- Councillors
- 9Lib Dem 3Residents 2Independent 2Conservative 11 otherShow councillors
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Waverley committee decisions →
This committee's year
52 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 7 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.