66 homes at Land North Of Drayhorse Meadow, Fields Lane, Wateringbury

Summary of planning committee decision

Deferred by Tonbridge Planning Committee on 24 Jun 2026.

25/01412/FLDeferred

What was proposed

The application sought 66 two-storey homes, including 50% affordable housing, with access, parking, open space and landscaping.

“Erection of 66 new homes (including affordable homes), together with associated open space, landscaping, access and parking.”

“Description of Proposal: 1.1 Planning permission is sought for the development of the site to provide 66 dwellings (including 50% affordable) together with associated access, parking, open space and landscaping. The development would deliver a mix of new homes (limited to two storey) comprising of 6 x 1 bed, 24 x 2, 24 x 3, and 11 x 4 bedroom homes.”

Officer report

The site and surroundings

The 4.42-hectare site is a horse-grazed field in the Metropolitan Green Belt, beside Wateringbury and near an air quality management area.

“Part 1 Public 3. The Site: 3.1 The application site extends approximately 4.42 ha and is located on the south side of Tonbridge Road 3.2 The site comprises a field which is currently used for horse grazing, alongside some small structures associated with its current use in the north-western corner and timber fencing. The site is currently accessed from Fields Lane. The site is bound by Tonbridge Road to the north and Fields Lane to the west.”

“A stretch of Tonbridge Road to the west (by the junction with Bow Road) is located within an Air Quality Management Area. 4. Planning History (relevant): 4.1 There is no recent relevant history for the site, the only planning history concerns an historic application for residientail developent in 1974. 74/12761/OLD - Refuse - 15 May 1974 Residential development with access. 5.”

Officer report

What officers recommended

Officers recommended approval because the site qualified as Grey Belt and the benefits of housing and affordable homes outweighed identified harm.

“Grey Belt 6.25 In regard to Grey Belt, paragraph 155 (NPPF) states that the development of homes, commercial and other development in the Green Belt should also not be regarded as inappropriate where: a) The development would utilise ‘grey belt’ land and would not fundamentally undermine the purposes (taken together) of the remaining Green Belt across the area of the plan; b) There is a demonstrable unmet need for the type of development proposed; c) The development would be…”

“Part 1 Public encroachment, the definition of Grey Belt is clear that it excludes Green Belt. As such, the site is not located in any of the other assets referred to in footnote 7. Therefore, the next test would be to establish if the parcel of land ‘strongly’ contributes to the Green Belt under purposes a), b), or d) as set out in Paragraph 143 (NPPF). These are: a) To check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas.”

Officer report

What the committee decided

Consideration of the application was adjourned until 23 July 2026, so no decision or vote was recorded.

“Consideration of this matter was adjourned until 23 July 2026.”

Minutes

Councillors at the meeting

Apologies Sarah Hudson Conservative

Also attending Bill Banks Lib Dem, Matt Boughton Conservative, Des Keers Conservative, Anita Oakley Lib Dem, Mark Rhodes Conservative, Roger Roud Lib Dem, Kim Tanner Conservative, Mike Taylor Independent

Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors and Democracy Club.

Sources

  • Tonbridge Planning Committee minutes, 24 June 2026
  • Agenda and papers (council website)

Source: Plota analysis of Tonbridge's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.

Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API

The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.

See the API →

At the meeting

Council
Tonbridge
Date
Wednesday 24 June 2026
Committee decided
Deferred
Councillors
13Conservative 6Lib Dem 3Green 2Independent 1Labour 1Show councillors
Minutes
The council's minutes
Meeting
Agenda and papers (council website)

This committee's year

6 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting.

Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.

Every decision by this council's committees →