24, The Grove, Lower Teddington Road, Hampton Wick Data via plota.co.uk

Approved PA26/3030 - Works to Tree/s in Conservation Area
Trees & landscaping
Council
Richmond upon Thames 4.4/10
Date received
28 Aug 2026
Date validated
28 Aug 2026
Decision date
1 Sept 2026
Type
Works to Tree/s in Conservation Area

Description

5 DAY DANGEROUS TREE NOTICE - dead wooding work on 7 holm oak trees at The Grove Data via plota.co.uk

Get alerts nearby Council site ↗

Last checked

How this decision compares

Decided in 4 days from validation, 27 days faster than Richmond upon Thames's median of 31 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 98% of tree and landscaping works here are.

98%decided within 8 weeks
98%approved
501decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Richmond upon Thames in the last twelve months, from validation. Richmond upon Thames decision record →

Site constraints 4

Flood zone 2, rivers and sea
Medium chance: between a 1 in 100 and 1 in 1,000 annual chance from rivers, or 1 in 200 to 1 in 1,000 from the sea. Any development here needs a flood risk assessment. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Homes in zone 3 must also pass the sequential test. Surface water flooding is a separate map.
Flood map ↗
Hampton Wick conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Council document ↗
Air quality management area: Richmond AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Also on the record
Inside the Richmond upon Thames built-up area.
Not affected
Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 11 September 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Richmond upon Thames - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Nearby new applications

4 Sept 2026Pending

COMO HOUSE WARWICK ROAD HAMPTON WICK KT1 4DW

Change of use of the existing office building from Class E to Class C3, to creat...

PA26/3074
3 Sept 2026Pending

29 To 31 High Street And Land To Rear Of High Street Hampton Wick

Non material amendment to planning permission 21/0586/FUL - Amend condition U016

PA26/3042
1 Sept 2026Pending

1, 1A and 3 Vicarage Road, Hampton Wick

Refurbishment of existing office building and its extension to the rear and repl...

PA26/2680
2 Sept 2026Pending

38 Clarence Street Kingston Upon Thames KT1 1NR

Application for a Non-Material Amendment to Planning Permission ref: 24/01215/FU...

26/01909/NMA
1 Sept 2026Pending

29 To 31 High Street And Land To Rear Of High Street Hampton Wick

Details pursuant to condition U0168820 - Grampian - Section 278, of planning per...

PA26/3039
26 Aug 2026Pending

19, Marina Place, Hampton Wick, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 4BH

Grounds of Marina Place T1: Silver birch tree – Fell to ground level Height...

PA26/2961
Richmond upon Thames
Planning Authority Score
4.4/10
Below average
#182 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Other decisions

Richmond upon Thames ranks #130 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Richmond upon Thames is also one of the strictest councils - it refuses more householder applications than almost any other, with only 82% approved vs 90% nationally.

One of the strictest councils
only 82% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Richmond upon Thames decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
81%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #257 of 296
82%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #268 of 296
69%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #130 of 296
35%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #104 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
181 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
3 decided (10+ homes)
47%
Change of use approved
17 decided
1,888
Total decisions
358 refused in the year to March 2026
Source: MHCLG planning statistics · See full council rankings