Land To The Rear Of Larks Rising Easton Lane IP18 6SS And The Warren Easton Lane Easton Bavents Reydon Suffolk IP18 6SU Data via plota.co.uk

DC/25/3322/FUL - Full Application Allowed on appeal

Proposal

4 Residential Properties to be built to replace 3 cottages already lost to erosion and 1 house due to be lost in the next 20 years. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
19 Aug 2025
✓
Validated
2 Sept 2025
✗
Refused
23 Jan 2026
✓
Appeal allowed
5 Aug 2026

Refused on 23 Jan 2026 · Committee Decision · Last checked 13 Oct 2026

Planning committee

Decided by East Suffolk Planning Committee North on 20 Jan 2026.

Refused

Against officer advice: officers had recommended approval.

  • Officers advised approval because the scheme replaced homes lost or threatened by erosion, despite some landscape harm.
  • Objectors and councillors raised concerns about farmland, wildlife, alternatives, scale, design and harm to the National Landscape.
  • The committee rejected approval and refused the application because the buildings’ scale, design and landscape impact conflicted with planning policies.
Read how the committee decided The proposal, coastal erosion history, objections, committee debate, vote and reasons for refusal. Includes the meeting recording

Source: Plota analysis of East Suffolk's committee minutes of 20 Jan 2026.

Documents 48

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 7

SSSI: Pakefield to Easton Bavents SSSI
Natural England must be consulted on work that may affect it.
Sites of special scientific interest are the best wildlife and geological sites in the country. Development likely to harm one is rarely permitted.
Suffolk Coast & Heaths National Landscape
Great weight to conserving the landscape; major development restricted.
Previously an area of outstanding natural beauty, which is still the designation in law. Since 2023 authorities must seek to further its purpose, not merely have regard to it.
Heritage coast: Suffolk
A defined stretch of undeveloped coastline.
Development inconsistent with keeping the coast undeveloped is resisted.
Agricultural land, grade 3b
Not best and most versatile land (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Source: the Predictive Agricultural Land Classification Map (Defra and Natural England, 2025; the Welsh Government's Predictive ALC Map 2 in Wales), a model rather than a site survey. Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s), which most planning maps still show, had this area as grade 4. The predicted grade is Defra's current estimate; only a site survey settles it.
Where development of farmland is needed, policy prefers poorer land over the best and most versatile (grades 1, 2 and 3a). Three sources: Natural England's post-1988 field surveys, which are definitive where they exist; the Defra predictive map for England (2025) and the Welsh Government predictive map, modelled from the soil map with 3a and 3b split; and the 1970s provisional map, which planners and other services still show, coarser and with grade 3 undivided. Where the provisional and predicted grades disagree, treat the predicted grade as the current estimate and expect an application to carry its own survey.
Special area of conservation 142 m away: Southern North Sea
Work nearby can need a habitats assessment.
Harm to a protected site is only accepted where there is no alternative and an overriding public interest.
Habitat network: Restorable Habitat
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
Also on the record
Priority habitat 14 m away: No main habitat but additional habitats present.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No listed building at the site

Checked on 2 November 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in East Suffolk - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Application type
Full Application
Postcode
IP18 6SU
Received
19 Aug 2025
Validated
2 Sept 2025
Ward
Southwold
Parish
Reydon
Case officer
Show
Target decision
28 Oct 2025
Decision
Application Refused
Decision date
23 Jan 2026
Decision level
Committee Decision
Appeal
Allowed · 5 Aug 2026 · Written Representations · Inspectorate case 6004646 ↗
Applicant
Show
Agent
Planning Direct

How this decision compares

Decided in 143 days from validation, 86 days slower than East Suffolk's median of 57 for full applications. Approved, as 94% of full applications here are.

49%decided within 8 weeks
94%approved
1,297decided in the last year

Plota live figures for full applications decided by East Suffolk in the last twelve months, from validation. East Suffolk decision record →

Public comments

5comments received
4 objecting1 supporting

80% object · above the UK average of 74%

6 neighbours consulted · Last counted 13 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Committee
20 Jan 2026
Statutory expiry
28 Oct 2025
Env. assessment
No
East Suffolk
Planning Authority Score
5.3/10
Average
#129 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

East Suffolk ranks #183 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (95%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
East Suffolk decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
92%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #81 of 296
95%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #76 of 296
60%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #183 of 296
42%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #162 of 296
80%
Minor dwellings approved
212 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
19 decided (10+ homes)
81%
Change of use approved
139 decided
1,965
Total decisions
158 refused in the year to March 2026