Rear extension at 30 Trent Road, Ipswich
Summary of planning committee decision
Decided by Ipswich Planning & Development Committee on 23 Sept 2026.
The site and its setting
The site is a two-storey semi-detached home with several rear outbuildings, and the extension would use matching brickwork and roof tiles.
“Recommendation Grant planning permission subject to the following condition (briefly):- 1. Development to be in accordance with approved drawings. Informatives:- 1. Construction times 2. Building Regulations The application is referred to the Planning and Development Committee because the applicant is related to an employee of Ipswich Borough Council. 1.Proposal 1.1The application site is a two-storey semi-detached dwelling within a residential area.”
“There are a number of existing outbuildings in the rear garden, which cover approx. one third of the rear garden. 1.3The extension is red brickwork to all elevations to match the existing front elevation, and red roof tiles to match the existing roof. There are two skylights on the roof and a bifold glass door to the rear. The existing dwelling’s side and rear elevations are pebbledash rendered. 1.4The application is supported by the following:- Plans and Drawings.”
Officer report
Objections raised
Four anonymous objections concerned light, outlook, noise, outbuildings, differences between plans and construction, overdevelopment, and garden space.
“Summary of issues raised:- • Concerns about loss of light and outlook to neighbouring property. • Concerns about construction noise. • Concerns about other outbuildings on the site. • Concerns than plans do not match what is already built. • Concerns about overdevelopment of the site and rear garden space.”
Officer report
The presentation
The Apprentice Town Planning Technician presented the application using drawings and photographs, and a further anonymous objection was received.
The committee’s decision
The committee resolved to grant planning permission subject to the approved-drawings condition and informatives about construction times and Building Regulations.
“Grant planning permission subject to the following condition (briefly):”
Minutes
Councillors at the meeting
- Peter GardinerChairLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Adam RaeVice-ChairLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Nic BartholomewLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Kelvin CracknellLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Roxanne DownesLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Carole JonesLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Colin KreidewolfLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- Philip SmartLabourFor(no vote against recorded)
- David HurlbutReform UKFor(no vote against recorded)
- Ryan ProcterReform UKFor(no vote against recorded)
- Nathan WilsonConservativeFor(no vote against recorded)
- Oliver HolmesLib DemFor(no vote against recorded)
The minutes record this decision with no vote against, so each member present for this item is shown as voting for it.
Apologies Richard Foster Reform UK
Source: Plota analysis of the council's minutes; parties from the council's list of councillors.
Sources
- Ipswich Planning & Development Committee minutes, 23 September 2026
- Agenda and papers (council website)
Source: Plota analysis of Ipswich's committee minutes and officer report. Quotations are the council's own words; headings and summaries are Plota's.
Committee decisions and nationwide planning applications, in one API
The Plota API returns planning applications from every council we cover, each with its decision, whether a committee or officers decided it, and the committee date. Build it into your own tools.
See the API →At the meeting
- Council
- Ipswich
- Date
- Wednesday 23 September 2026
- Recommendation
- Officers recommended approval
- Committee decided
- Approved
- Councillors
- 12Labour 8Reform UK 2Conservative 1Lib Dem 1Show votes
- Minutes
- The council's minutes
- Meeting
- Agenda and papers (council website)
- Application
- View application →
- All decisions
- Ipswich committee decisions →
This committee's year
26 decisions in the 12 months to this meeting, 4 against officer advice.
Source: Plota analysis of the committee's minutes.