Public Car Park And Amenity Area Burrell Road Ipswich Suffolk Data via plota.co.uk

25/00832/NMMA - Non Material Minor Amendment Pending Consideration

Proposal

Non-material amendment to planning permission (Use of site as a public car park for a period of three years.) lowering required EV charging speed from 50kW - 100 kW to 7.5kW to 22kW. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
21 Nov 2025
Decision
Target date was 19 Dec 2025

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. A decision is expected by 19 Dec 2025.

Associated applications 3

Site constraints 8

Article 4 direction
Article 4 Direction for Small HMOs. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
In flood zones plus climate change
Inside the extent flood zones 2 and 3 could reach with climate change: the Central allowance for the 2080s on rivers, the Upper End allowance for sea level rise to 2125. From the sea. Defences are not counted.
The Environment Agency flood map for planning. Councils use it to decide when a flood risk assessment and the sequential test are needed. It is indicative and does not show whether a particular property will flood.
Flood map ↗
Radon affected area, class 6
An estimated 30% or more of homes reach the radon action level. Indicative for the 1 km square, which takes the highest class found in it; a radon test gives the answer for a building.
From the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency indicative atlas. Under building regulations, as the BRE guide BR 211 (2023) sets out, new buildings and extensions need basic radon protection from class 3 in England and Wales and from class 2 in Scotland, and full protection from class 5. The class at the site itself, from the detailed BGS map, decides which.
UKHSA radon ↗
Also on the record
SSSI about 347 m away: Stoke Tunnel Cutting SSSI; National infrastructure project about 1931 m away: Ipswich Rail Chord; Flood defence about 32 m from the postcode pin (wall); Inside the Ipswich built-up area; Priority habitat about 42 m away: Mudflats.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 2 November 2026. The pin for this application is the centre of its postcode rather than the building, so distances to nearby designations are measured from the postcode and can be out by the width of the postcode area. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Ipswich - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Ipswich
Application type
Non Material Minor Amendment
Received
21 Nov 2025
Validated
21 Nov 2025
Ward
BRIDGE
Case officer
Show
Target decision
19 Dec 2025
Applicant
Show

Consultation & key dates

Site or press notice
2 Dec 2025
Ipswich
Planning Authority Score
7.6/10
Good
#38 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Ipswich is faster than most councils at deciding householder applications, ranking #67 out of 296. Householder applications are more likely to be approved here than most councils, with a 98% approval rate vs 90% nationally.

More permissive than most councils
98% approved vs 90% nationally
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Ipswich decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
94%
Overall approval rate
Above avg (87%) #40 of 296
98%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #18 of 296
76%
Decided in 8 weeks
Above avg (63%) #67 of 296
38%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #129 of 296
81%
Minor dwellings approved
27 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
5 decided (10+ homes)
82%
Change of use approved
62 decided
429
Total decisions
27 refused in the year to March 2026