PRINCES COURT, 6 Croxteth Road, Liverpool Data via plota.co.uk

26T/2359 - Tree Works Consent Approved

Proposal

To carry out tree works Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
21 Aug 2026
✓
Approved
15 Oct 2026

Approved on 15 Oct 2026 · Delegated · Last checked 19 Oct 2026

Site constraints 8

Princes Park conservation area
Demolition needs planning permission and permitted development is restricted.
The council must give weight to preserving or enhancing the area's character and appearance. Not every council has published its boundaries as open data.
Article 4 direction
The Liverpool (Anfield, Central, Greenbank, Kensington and Fairfield, Picton, Princess Park, Riverside, Tuebrook and Stoneycroft and Wavertree wards and parts of Kirkdale and Church wards) (Article 4(. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Air quality management area: Liverpool City AQMA
The council has declared the area as failing an air quality objective.
Schemes that add traffic, parking or combustion plant are assessed against the area's action plan and may need an air quality assessment.
Council record ↗
Registered park or garden 16 m away: Princes Park, Liverpool
Its setting is a consideration for work nearby.
Registered parks and gardens, battlefields, world heritage sites and protected wrecks are designated heritage assets: harm needs clear and convincing justification.
Historic England ↗
5 listed buildings within 150 m
Nearest: Memorial to Richard Vaughan Yates Facing Main Entrance, Grade II, 30 m away · 5 Grade II
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Show all 5 with distances
Historic England ↗
Also on the record
National infrastructure project: Mersey Tidal Power Project, at pre-application; Tree preservation order 10 m away: A group of trees on the rear boundary of the site.; Inside the Liverpool built-up area.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 17 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Planning Inspectorate and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Liverpool - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Liverpool
Application type
Tree Works Consent
Received
21 Aug 2026
Validated
21 Aug 2026
Ward
Princes Park
Parish
City South
Case officer
Show
Target decision
16 Oct 2026
Decision
Approved with Conditions
Decision date
15 Oct 2026
Decision level
Delegated
Applicant
Show
Agent
Paramount Arbor Ltd

How this decision compares

Decided in 55 days from validation, 19 days slower than Liverpool's median of 36 for tree and landscaping works. Approved, as 84% of tree and landscaping works here are.

89%decided within 8 weeks
84%approved
280decided in the last year

Plota live figures for tree and landscaping works decided by Liverpool in the last twelve months, from validation. Liverpool decision record →

Consultation & key dates

Statutory expiry
16 Oct 2026
Liverpool
Planning Authority Score
4.8/10
Below average
#160 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Householder decisions

Liverpool ranks #165 out of 296 councils for householder decision speed. Householder applications are slightly more likely to be approved here (92%) than the national average (90%).

These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Liverpool decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
85%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #209 of 296
92%
Householder approved
Above avg (90%) #157 of 296
62%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #165 of 296
39%
Extended time limit
Below avg (41%) #138 of 296
68%
Minor dwellings approved
47 decided (1-9 homes)
82%
Major dwellings approved
17 decided (10+ homes)
61%
Change of use approved
195 decided
1,478
Total decisions
222 refused in the year to March 2026