Land At Lower Carr Farm Yarraville Street Rawtenstall Rossendale Lancashire BB4 6BU Data via plota.co.uk

2025/0379 - Outline Application Approved at committee

Approved at planning committee on 3 March 2026, subject to a legal agreement. The council issues its decision notice once the agreement is signed.

Proposal

Outline application for the erection of up to 40 dwellings, with all matters reserved except access. Data via plota.co.uk

View original council record ↗Last checked

Application progress

✓
Received
10 Sept 2025
✓
Validated
24 Sept 2025
✓
Consultation
30 Jan 2026
✓
Committee
3 Mar 2026
Decision notice
Not issued yet

Under consideration

No decision has been issued yet. Plota predicted a decision soon after comments close on 20 Feb 2026; it is now day 401.

The consultation period closed on 20 Feb 2026.

Planning committee

Decided by Rossendale Development Control Committee on 3 Mar 2026. The council has not yet issued its decision notice.

Approved

No officer report was published for this decision; this summary is from the committee minutes.

  • An objector spoke against the application, a supporter spoke in favour, and Councillor McInnes also addressed the application.
  • Members discussed HS2 policy, the density of development, heritage impact, drainage and surface water, and differences from the previous application.
  • The committee voted 5 for and 2 against to be minded to grant permission, delegating the final decision to the Head of Planning pending a legal agreement.
Read how the committee decided The objector and supporter, the debate and the section 106 contributions secured.

Source: Plota analysis of Rossendale's committee minutes of 3 Mar 2026.

Documents 63

Consultation & comments 28

PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show General Comment · 7 Mar 2026 View ↗
PDF RBC FORWARD PLANNING CONSULTEE COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 10 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF ENVIRONMENT AGENCY - COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 10 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF LCC HIGHWAYS - FURTHER COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 9 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF UNITED UTILITIES - FURTHER COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 2 Feb 2026 View ↗ PDF RBC OPERATIONS - FURTHER COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 29 Jan 2026 View ↗ PDF GROWTH LANCASHIRE - FURTHER COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 19 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF LLFA RESPONSE Consultee Comment · 12 Dec 2025 View ↗ PDF LANCASHIRE FIRE & RESCUE - FUTHER COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 28 Nov 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Consultee Comment · 25 Nov 2025 View ↗
PDF TOGETHER HOUSING - COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 25 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF NEIGHBOUR OBJECTIONS 18.11.2025 REDACTED Objection Comment · 18 Nov 2025 View ↗ PDF UNITED UTILITIES - COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 31 Oct 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 24 Oct 2025 View ↗
PDF GROWTH LANCASHIRE - COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 23 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF LCC HIGHWAYS - COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 22 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF LCC PROW - COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 20 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF LCC HIGHWAYS - COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 20 Oct 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 17 Oct 2025 View ↗
PDF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION - COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 17 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF LCC ARCHAEOLOGY - COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 15 Oct 2025 View ↗
PDF Objector’s name hidden Show Objection Comment · 8 Oct 2025 View ↗
PDF RBC OPERATIONS - COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 6 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF POLICE ARCHITECTURAL LIAISON - COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 3 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF LANCASHIRE FIRE & RESCUE - COMMENTS REDACTED Consultee Comment · 1 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF CADNET GAS - COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 1 Oct 2025 View ↗ PDF TREE OFFICER - COMMENTS Consultee Comment · 30 Sept 2025 View ↗
PDF Commenter’s name hidden Show Other · 10 Sept 2025 View ↗

All documents on the council site ↗

Site constraints 9

Public footpath 7 m away
Matters where it crosses or adjoins the site: obstructing a path without a diversion order is an offence, and work cannot start until the order is confirmed.
Compiled from highway authority data, not the legal definitive map. A few authorities have not published, so no path shown is not proof there is none.
Article 4 direction
Immediate Article 4 Direction for small Houses in Multiple Occupation. Named permitted development rights are withdrawn here.
An Article 4 direction withdraws particular permitted development rights, so work that would normally need no application needs one here. Not every council has published its directions.
Habitat network: Network Enhancement Zone 2
Where habitat is joined up enough to work as a network. Context, not a constraint on its own.
1 listed building within 150 m
Nearest: Middle Carr Farm, Grade II, 52 m away
The site itself is not listed. Listed building consent is needed for work that affects the special interest of a listed building, inside or out, on top of planning permission. Setting can be a consideration for buildings nearby; there is no fixed radius.
Historic England ↗
Also on the record
Radon affected area, class 4; Coalfield, development low risk area; Inside the Rawtenstall built-up area; Priority habitat 49 m away: Lowland fens; Natural England's Provisional ALC map (1:250,000, 1970s) had this area as grade 4, but it predates the buildings here and the current map does not class it as farmland.
Not affected
Outside flood zones 2 and 3 · Not green belt · No scheduled monument at the site

Checked on 12 October 2026. Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England, the Mining Remediation Authority, the British Geological Survey and UK Health Security Agency (radon, contains BGS materials © UKRI) and council datasets, Open Government Licence. A boundary can run through a site and the council holds the definitive record: confirm with the council before relying on this.

Work with planning data?

Every application in Rossendale - and every UK council - as a live feed, an API, or a bulk CSV export.

About Plota's data service

Important details

Council
Rossendale
Application type
Outline Application
Postcode
BB4 6BU
Received
10 Sept 2025
Validated
24 Sept 2025
Ward
Longholme
Case officer
Show
Target decision
6 Mar 2026
Applicant
Show
Agent
JPE Consultancy Limited

Decision outlook

Day 401, past the statutory target. 63% of outline applications in Rossendale are decided within thirteen weeks; extensions of time are common, and the council need not decide on the day. Last seen undecided on 29 Oct 2026.

Day 401310 days past the 91-day target
41%decided within 8 weeks
59%approved
12%go to committee

Plota live figures for outline applications decided across the UK in the last twelve months, from validation; too few recent outline applications in Rossendale to go on. Rossendale decision record →

Public comments

11comments received
10 objecting1 neutral

91% object · above the UK average of 74%

87 neighbours consulted · Last counted 29 Oct 2026

Read the comments on the council site ↗

Consultation & key dates

Neighbours
7 Oct 2025
Consultation
30 Jan 2026
Comments by
20 Feb 2026
Site or press notice
17 Oct 2025
Statutory expiry
24 Dec 2025
Env. assessment
No
Rossendale
Planning Authority Score
1/10
Poor
#293 of 296 councils
Relevant to this application:
Major dwellings

Rossendale is one of the slowest councils in England for householder decisions, ranking #287 out of 296. The council extends the time limit on 75% of applications - one of the highest rates in England. Expect your application to take longer than the standard deadline. Householder applications are slightly less likely to be approved here (88%) than the national average (90%).

Among the slowest councils in England
for householder decisions
These figures are council-wide context, not a prediction for this application. View full council performance
Rossendale decision statistics
Based on MHCLG data, the year to March 2026
86%
Overall approval rate
Below avg (87%) #197 of 296
88%
Householder approved
Below avg (90%) #222 of 296
27%
Decided in 8 weeks
Below avg (63%) #287 of 296
75%
Extended time limit
Above avg (41%) #293 of 296
85%
Minor dwellings approved
34 decided (1-9 homes)
100%
Major dwellings approved
3 decided (10+ homes)
59%
Change of use approved
17 decided
231
Total decisions
33 refused in the year to March 2026